Saturday 27/Sep/2025 – 11:25 PM
The board of directors of the Egyptian club Al -Portsaidi, headed by Kamel Abu Ali, expressed its strong dissatisfaction with the suspicious arbitration performance, which was presented by the refereeing team of the Egyptian match, and was promoted by the referee Mohamed Abbas Kabil and the rule of Al -Far Technology, Khaled Al -Ghandour.
Al -Masry threatens to withdraw from the league because of the arbitration errors
Al -Masry said in an official statement: The Egyptian Council confirms that what the arbitration team presented in today’s match is not related to football from near or far due to the wrong arbitration decisions taken by the arbitration team and video technology, especially in the comic penalty kick calculated on the Egyptian during the second half of the match, which confirms the intense training by the arbitration team of the Egyptian team for a reason or another that only those in charge of the Egyptian football administration know in general And the Egyptian arbitration in particular, which has become for him, and in a way that calls for doubt a major role in directing the results of the matches and gifting the victory to specific teams, especially with the duplicity of the decisions in making decisions to serve specific teams, and that other teams from the competition.
The Egyptian club’s statement added: The Egyptian board of directors is surprised by the calculation of the match referee – which does not rise to manage any matches in any degree of league – for only ten minutes as a time calculated instead of lost in the second half at a time when the match stopped to review the second goal of the Egyptian and the alleged penalty kicks calculated by Petrojet for more than ten minutes, which confirms the weakness of the personality of the referee who remained in front of the mouse screen for long minutes. About any justification for calculating the penalty for a purpose in himself that he does not know.
The club’s statement continued: Therefore, the Egyptian club’s board of directors is in a permanent convening from now to study the taking of many escalatory decisions, which may reach the freezing of its sports activity and the withdrawal from the league championship, especially in light of the lack of the principle of equal opportunities and honorable competition that has become the Egyptian arbitration. Zamalek led by the rule of the square Mahmoud Naji and the referee of video technology, Ahmed Al -Ghandour, that a correct penalty kick for the Egyptian with the testimony of everyone, which would undoubtedly lead to change the course of the match.
Al -Masry continued in his statement: Despite the repeated promises to reform the arbitration state, the matter remained as it is a compliment to a specific team and an injustice between other teams, foremost of which is the Egyptian club, which is considering its officials, led by Professor Kamel Abu Ali, the club’s board chairman, in making an actual decision not to complete the current period of the age of the board It has become an arena for compliments and wasting rights.
Al -Masry Al -Portsaid concluded: As usual, the Egyptian Club’s board of directors, and through this blatant statement, re -sounds the alarm so that all those in charge of Egyptian football be noted quickly reforming the arbitration system, which has become one of the most important obstacles that stand in front of the reform of the Egyptian football.
