Not every fact is said, nor every word is published, nor every knowledge that is broadcast, at a time when family issues have been exported to the addresses of platforms, and the details of the public conversations are filled, it is necessary to stop in front of a fundamental question: Where does freedom of expression stand, and where does the sanctity of man begin?
There are issues related to proportions, honor, custody, and the ruin of homes, they should not be consumed as a content, because in this a break of a veil that is not restored, and naked to a person who has no voice in the face of the noise of publishing, the general circulation in such cases is not only transferred from private to year, but is thrown into an unforgiving square, where the rulings are reshape Justice.
The danger does not lie in spreading the single story, but rather in the accumulation of publishing, and the accustomed to people on these details, until it became a shocking day as a familiar thing that does not stop the conscience. Here, “moral normalization” sneaks in silence, so he reshapes the collective awareness of what is acceptable and what is ostracized.
We must realize that privacy is not a privilege, but rather an authentic human right, and that preserving it is not merely a legal commitment, but a moral position that respects the fragility of man in its most vulnerable moments, and the word – when this right goes beyond – does not return an expression tool, but rather becomes a tool of an unlawful detection, unlawful pressure, or a previous judgment of justice.
And if the media is responsible for controlling its criteria, then the responsibility also extends to those working in the legal and social fields, and to everyone who has a platform, opinion, or ability to influence, then not everything that is known is said, and not everything that is said is published, and not everything that is published.
As for the lawyer, journalist, or those who possess the files of the cases, these are not only witnesses to the issues, but partners in the way they are presented to public opinion, a campaign of trust before God and society, whoever chooses to deal with people’s issues, he chose to be responsible for the impact of the word, the path of justice, and the tranquility of society.
Whisper
Responsibility is not exclusive to those who write or publish, but extend to all of us, who are the recipients, because the way we circulate such issues, our comments on it, and re -publish them, either to be a participation in the violation of privacy, or a pause of consciousness that preserves dignity, let us choose the word that does not hurt, and let us refrain from publishing that is merciful The noble.
