The Criminal Criminal Court acquitted two doctors and a third trained of the charge of causing their mistake in injuring the back nerve of the foot of a patient during the extraction of a metal nail from it, which left a 12%permanent disability, and the court confirmed that the papers were free of evidence with which the three doctors condemned. Specialists of removing a nail from the ankle of the patient’s foot, the victim, and his role in the operation was limited to opening the wound and closing it and using the second accused, who completed the surgery and opened the membrane and removed the medical screw from the bones of the victim, but he left the patient to have an injury in the back nerve. His statements in the public prosecution’s investigations that his role was limited to opening the place of the previous scarring longitudinally, while the specialist doctor (the second accused) took over the process of removing the membrane formed on the bone and extracting the nail, and then commissioned him to close the place of the operation. The evidence is free from any suspicion or possibility, and the court indicated that the injury that occurred to the victim arose as a result of interrelated actions at the same time and place without the papers containing evidence that determines the physical action attributed to each of them in accuracy and certainty, which arose with him a state of prevalence of verbs, so that it has become not possible to set from the latest infection specifically.
