The news abounds and abounds about the possibility of a second confrontation between Israel and Iran, the same reasons that erupted due to the first confrontation about a month ago, and it lasted for 12 days, and I mean the Iranian nuclear file.
It seems that Israel is continuing in its orgasm, which is far from the civilized diplomatic language to which the United States is left, which is to restore talks on the nuclear file with Iran, but the Israeli escalation may limit American diplomatic “sobriety” in this particular matter, which may be forced to abandon, in the event of a second war or a new battle between the two parties, where America will definitely tend with the Israeli side.
What is difficult is that Israel is not alone who accuses Iran of possessing fertilized uranium, and that its ability to enrich is still in place, despite the targeting of the three Iranian nuclear facilities, which are “Fordo”, “Natanz” and “Isfahan”, but that France also entered the line strongly, and its intelligence said that Iran has the ability to enrich uranium in lower degrees after the American strikes, warning of The possibility of Iran continues to develop a program parallel to less fertilized capabilities.
With this harmonious or supportive French position – even if indirectly – the latter may tend to fabricate a second battle with Iran, especially since the American news site «Axios», reported that Israel is studying new offensive options against Iran, in the event of the latter to revive its nuclear program, but at the same time, Iran has also climbed the language of threat, and confirmed by its president, Masoud Bazzkian, that the Iranian response will be more “Himm and Ilam”, in the event of repeated what he described as the Israeli aggression, according to the Iranian “Mizan” agency.
The region has recently experienced a bitter experience after the Israeli -Iranian war, but the impact may be more severe in the event of the repetition of these confrontations, so the diplomatic approach must be overlooked, the sitting at the dialogue table, the revival of the American -Iranian negotiations, whose conditions of residence are still vague and unlimited, and here it is necessary to deter Israel, which seeks to obstruct these negotiations again, and its insistence on the escalation against Iran that will not be accepted. By restoring negotiations in light of these Israeli threats, the United States is primarily concerned with facilitating the restoration of these negotiations, and brushing the mouths of some Israeli officials who do not want peace and stability to the region.
