Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 130–137 (1980).
Google Scholar
Wood-Charlson, E. M. et al. The National Microbiome Data Collaborative: enabling microbiome science. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 313–314 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arkin, A. P. et al. KBase: the United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 566–569 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cavicchioli, R. et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 569–586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hutchins, D. A. & Fu, F. Microorganisms and ocean global change. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17058 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sunagawa, S. et al. Tara Oceans: towards global ocean ecosystems biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 428–445 (2020).
Google Scholar
Battin, T. J. et al. River ecosystem metabolism and carbon biogeochemistry in a changing world. Nature 613, 449–459 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kroeze, C., Dumont, E. & Seitzinger, S. P. New estimates of global emissions of N2O from rivers and estuaries. Environ. Sci. 2, 159–165 (2005).
Google Scholar
Butman, D. & Raymond, P. A. Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States. Nat. Geosci. 4, 839–842 (2011).
Google Scholar
Anderson, E. P. et al. Understanding rivers and their social relations: a critical step to advance environmental water management. WIREs Water 6, e1381 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mishra, A., Alnahit, A. & Campbell, B. Impact of land uses, drought, flood, wildfire, and cascading events on water quality and microbial communities: a review and analysis. J. Hydrol. 596, 125707 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ramos, J. A. et al. Genome-resolved metaproteomics decodes the microbial and viral contributions to coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in river sediments. mSystems 7, e00516-22 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, D., Ghosh, A. & Bhadury, P. Arsenic through aquatic trophic levels: effects, transformations and biomagnification—a concise review. Geosci. Lett. 9, 20 (2022).
Google Scholar
Boddicker, A. M. & Mosier, A. C. Genomic profiling of four cultivated Candidatus Nitrotoga spp. predicts broad metabolic potential and environmental distribution. ISME J. 12, 2864–2882 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chu, H., Gao, G.-F., Ma, Y., Fan, K. & Delgado-Baquerizo, M. Soil microbial biogeography in a changing world: recent advances and future perspectives. mSystems 5, e00803-19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stadler, M. & del Giorgio, P. A. Terrestrial connectivity, upstream aquatic history and seasonality shape bacterial community assembly within a large boreal aquatic network. ISME J. 16, 937–947 (2022).
Google Scholar
Crump, B. C., Amaral-Zettler, L. A. & Kling, G. W. Microbial diversity in arctic freshwaters is structured by inoculation of microbes from soils. ISME J. 6, 1629–1639 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ruiz-González, C., Niño-García, J. P. & del Giorgio, P. A. Terrestrial origin of bacterial communities in complex boreal freshwater networks. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1198–1206 (2015).
Google Scholar
Read, D. S. et al. Catchment-scale biogeography of riverine bacterioplankton. ISME J. 9, 516–526 (2015).
Google Scholar
Savio, D. et al. Bacterial diversity along a 2600 km river continuum. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 4994–5007 (2015).
Google Scholar
Payne, J. T., Millar, J. J., Jackson, C. R. & Ochs, C. A. Patterns of variation in diversity of the Mississippi river microbiome over 1,300 kilometers. PLoS ONE 12, e0174890 (2017).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
Google Scholar
Garner, R. E. et al. A genome catalogue of lake bacterial diversity and its drivers at continental scale. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 1920–1934 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nayfach, S. et al. A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 499–509 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ramos, J. et al. Spatial and temporal metagenomics of river compartments reveals viral community dynamics in an urban impacted stream. Front. Microbiomes 2, 1199766 (2023).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goldman, A. E., Emani, S. R., Pérez-Angel, L. C., Rodríguez-Ramos, J. A. & Stegen, J. C. Integrated, coordinated, open, and networked (ICON) science to advance the geosciences: introduction and synthesis of a special collection of commentary articles. Earth Space Sci. 9, e2021EA002099 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jezbera, J., Sharma, A. K., Brandt, U., Doolittle, W. F. & Hahn, M. W. ‘Candidatus Planktophila limnetica’, an actinobacterium representing one of the most numerically important taxa in freshwater bacterioplankton. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 2864–2869 (2009).
Google Scholar
Stein, L. Y. Insights into the physiology of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 49, 9–15 (2019).
Google Scholar
Daims, H. et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528, 504–509 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, S. et al. Comammox Nitrospira within the Yangtze River continuum: community, biogeography, and ecological drivers. ISME J. 14, 2488–2504 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wrighton, K. C. et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661–1665 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lian, Y., Zhen, L., Chen, X., Li, Y. & Li, X. Microbial biomarkers as indication of dynamic and heterogeneous urban water environments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24539-8 (2022).
Regina, A. L. A. et al. A watershed impacted by anthropogenic activities: microbial community alterations and reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes. Sci. Total Environ. 793, 148552 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ploug, H., Kühl, M. & Buchholzcleven, B. Anoxic aggregates—an ephemeral phenomenon in the pelagic environment? Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 13, 285–294 (1997).
Google Scholar
Böckelmann, U., Manz, W., Neu, T. R. & Szewzyk, U. Characterization of the microbial community of lotic organic aggregates (‘river snow’) in the Elbe River of Germany by cultivation and molecular methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33, 157–170 (2000).
Google Scholar
Battin, T. J. et al. Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. Nat. Geosci. 1, 95–100 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gomes, I. B., Maillard, J.-Y., Simões, L. C. & Simões, M. Emerging contaminants affect the microbiome of water systems—strategies for their mitigation. Npj Clean Water 3, 39 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Liu, H. & Paul Chen, J. Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Res. 137, 362–374 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mdee, A. et al. The top 100 global water questions: results of a scoping exercise. One Earth 5, 563–573 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zrimec, J., Kokina, M., Jonasson, S., Zorrilla, F. & Zelezniak, A. Plastic-degrading potential across the global microbiome correlates with recent pollution trends. mBio 12, e0215521 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jia, S. et al. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes and their associations with bacterial community in livestock breeding wastewater and its receiving river water. Water Res. 124, 259–268 (2017).
Google Scholar
Alcock, B. P. et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–D699 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yushchuk, O., Binda, E. & Marinelli, F. Glycopeptide antibiotic resistance genes: distribution and function in the producer Actinomycetes. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1173 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pal, A., He, Y., Jekel, M., Reinhard, M. & Gin, K. Y.-H. Emerging contaminants of public health significance as water quality indicator compounds in the urban water cycle. Environ. Int. 71, 46–62 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lear, G. et al. The biogeography of stream bacteria. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 544–554 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dickey, J. R. et al. The utility of macroecological rules for microbial biogeography. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 633155 (2021).
Smith, L. C. et al. Large-scale drivers of relationships between soil microbial properties and organic carbon across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 2070–2083 (2021).
Google Scholar
DeLong, E. F. Microbial community genomics in the ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 459–469 (2005).
Google Scholar
Omernik, J. M. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 77, 118–125 (1987).
Google Scholar
Fine, A. K., van Es, H. M. & Schindelbeck, R. R. Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 81, 589–601 (2017).
Google Scholar
Henson, M. W. et al. Nutrient dynamics and stream order influence microbial community patterns along a 2914 kilometer transect of the Mississippi River. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 1837–1855 (2018).
Google Scholar
Satinsky, B. M. et al. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic inventories of the lower Amazon River, May 2011. Microbiome 3, 39 (2015).
Google Scholar
Maiolini, B. & Bruno, M. C. The River Continuum Concept revisited: Lessons from the Alps (Innsbruck Univ. Press, 2023).
Mincer, T. J. & Aicher, A. C. Methanol production by a broad phylogenetic array of marine phytoplankton. PLoS ONE 11, e0150820 (2016).
Google Scholar
McInerney, M. J. et al. Physiology, ecology, phylogeny, and genomics of microorganisms capable of syntrophic metabolism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125, 58–72 (2008).
Google Scholar
Schink, B. & Zeikus, J. G. Microbial methanol formation: a major end product of pectin metabolism. Curr. Microbiol. 4, 387–389 (1980).
Google Scholar
Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 172–185 (2007).
Google Scholar
Gudmundsson, L. et al. Globally observed trends in mean and extreme river flow attributed to climate change. Science 371, 1159–1162 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hundley N. Jr Water and the West: The Colorado River Compact and the Politics of Water in the American West (Univ. California Press, 2009).
Arora, B. et al. Building cross-site and cross-network collaborations in critical zone science. J. Hydrol. 618, 129248 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stegen, J. C. & Goldman, A. E. WHONDRS: a community resource for studying dynamic river corridors. mSystems 3, e00151-18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Garayburu-Caruso, V. A. et al. Using community science to reveal the global chemogeography of river metabolomes. Metabolites 10, 518 (2020).
Google Scholar
Toyoda, J. et al. WHONDRS Summer 2019 Sampling Campaign: Global River Corridor Surface Water FTICR-MS, NPOC, and Stable Isotopes https://doi.org/10.15485/1603775 (2020).
US Geological Survey. In Book 9: Techniques for Water-Resources Investigations Ch. A4 pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/twri09A4 (2006).
Lee, C. J. & Henderson, R. J. Tracking Water Quality in U. S. Streams and Rivers https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/fs20213019 (USGS, 2020).
Crump, B. C., Kling, G. W., Bahr, M. & Hobbie, J. E. Bacterioplankton community shifts in an Arctic lake correlate with seasonal changes in organic matter source. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2253–2268 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kellogg, C. T. E., McClelland, J. W., Dunton, K. H. & Crump, B. C. Strong seasonality in Arctic estuarine microbial food webs. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2628 (2019).
Google Scholar
Borton, M. A. Genome Resolved Open Watersheds database (GROWdb). Github https://github.com/jmikayla1991/Genome-Resolved-Open-Watersheds-database-GROWdb (2023).
Hill, R. A., Weber, M. H., Leibowitz, S. G., Olsen, A. R. & Thornbrugh, D. J. The Stream-Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: a database of watershed metrics for the conterminous United States. JAWRA 52, 120–128 (2016).
Google Scholar
Blodgett, D., Johnson, J. M. & Bock, A. Generating a reference flow network with improved connectivity to support durable data integration and reproducibility in the coterminous US. Environ. Model. Softw. 165, 105726 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J. et al. Package ‘terra’ (2022).
Willi, K. R., Matthew R. V. & ROSS. Genome Resolved Open Watersheds Database (GROWdb) Geospatial data puller. Github https://github.com/rossyndicate/GROWdb (2023).
Joshi, N. A. & Fass, J. N. Sickle: a windowed adaptive trimming tool for FASTQ files using quality. Github https://github.com/najoshi/sickle (2011).
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Leung, H. C. M., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. L. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420–1428 (2012).
Clum, A. et al. DOE JGI metagenome workflow. mSystems 6, e00804-20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Woodcroft, B. J. CoverM. Github https://github.com/wwood/CoverM (2023).
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tavormina, P. L., Orphan, V. J., Kalyuzhnaya, M. G., Jetten, M. S. M. & Klotz, M. G. A novel family of functional operons encoding methane/ammonia monooxygenase-related proteins in gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 3, 91–100 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rochman, F. F. et al. Novel copper-containing membrane monooxygenases (CuMMOs) encoded by alkane-utilizing Betaproteobacteria. ISME J. 14, 714–726 (2020).
Google Scholar
Borton, M. A. et al. Coupled laboratory and field investigations resolve microbial interactions that underpin persistence in hydraulically fractured shales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6585–E6594 (2018).
Google Scholar
Solden, L. M. et al. New roles in hemicellulosic sugar fermentation for the uncultivated Bacteroidetes family BS11. ISME J. 11, 691–703 (2017).
Google Scholar
Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552 (2000).
Google Scholar
Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104–2105 (2005).
Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Google Scholar
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Google Scholar
Woodcroft, B. J. et al. SingleM and Sandpiper: robust microbial taxonomic profiles from metagenomic data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.578060 (2024).
Borton, M. A. et al. Data for ‘A functional microbiome catalogue crowdsourced from North American rivers’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8173286 (2024).
Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A. et al. The National Microbiome Data Collaborative Data Portal: an integrated multi-omics microbiome data resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D828–D836 (2022).
Google Scholar
Borton, M. A. et al. Data generation scripts for ‘A functional microbiome catalogue crowdsourced from North American rivers’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11041178 (2024).
Borton, M. A. et al. Figure generation code for ‘A functional microbiome catalogue crowdsourced from North American rivers’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11188634 (2024).
