Friday 27/June/2025 – 04:40 PM
Speculation on the role of US President Donald Trump in ending the war in Gaza is escalating, amid reports indicating widespread diplomatic moves aimed at achieving regional stability.
Trump’s recent statements about ending the trial of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as his plans to expand Abraham’s agreements and support the two -state solution, sparked discussions about the possibility of achieving a comprehensive peace in the Middle East.
However, can Trump become a “man of peace”, or does these moves hide other political agendas? What are the possible repercussions, and its relationship to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza?
Diplomatic move
The Israeli Broadcasting Corporation quoted an Israeli source that Trump’s statements about ending the Netanyahu trial were not random, but rather part of a wide diplomatic move aimed at ending the war in Gaza, release the hostages, and promoting regional stability by expanding normalization agreements.
Israeli reports indicate that Trump and Netanyahu agreed during a telephone conversation to end the war within two weeks, with the participation of four Arab countries in the management of the Gaza Strip after the war, denied Hamas leaders, and release the hostages.
Does Trump pay the Gaza war and Netanyahu’s trial?
The plan also includes the expansion of Abraham’s agreements, which are topped by: Syria, with these countries recognizing Israel and establishing diplomatic relations.
On the other hand, Israel will express its willingness to support a two -state solution, on the condition of reforms in the Palestinian Authority, while the United States will recognize limited Israeli sovereignty over parts of the West Bank.
This plan, which Israel Hume newspaper described as ambitious, aims to change the regional alliance system, with a focus on weakening Iran’s influence and dismantling cross -bars with it.
Targeted results
Trump’s comments about ending the Netanyahu trial, in which he faced corruption charges, sparked widespread controversy. Trump called for the cancellation of the trial or gave Netanyahu an amnesty, noting that the United States saved Israel and will save Netanyahu now.
These statements, which Israeli sources described as part of a diplomatic move, have sparked criticism of the Israeli opposition in which they saw external interference.
The ruling coalition members are considering using this statement to support a draft law to cancel the trial, indicating that American support may be a political tool to enhance Netanyahu’s position internally.
Israel Hume newspaper indicates that Trump put pressure on Netanyahu to end the war before the attack on Iran, and resumed this pressure after its end.
This pressure reflects Trump’s dominance of the Israeli decision, as analysts indicated that Netanyahu was subjected to similar pressure in the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon.
However, some believe that Trump’s support may be conditional on gifts such as the expansion of settlement in the West Bank, the abolition of the Biden administration’s administration on settlers, and the support of the war appeal later.
Illness or truth?
The expansion of normalization agreements, which Trump in his first term is a major axis in his plan, as the agreements, which printed relations between Israel, the Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan, aimed at including new countries such as Syria.
Saudi Arabia requires the establishment of a Palestinian state as a condition for normalization, which contradicts Netanyahu’s position rejecting Palestinian sovereignty.
Trump promised to support the two -state solution seems to be conditional on reforms in the Palestinian Authority, which raises doubts about his seriousness, especially in light of the statements of his son -in -law Jared Kushner, who described the establishment of a Palestinian state as a reward for terrorism.
This contradiction reflects the challenges of achieving a two -state solution, which was supported by the Palestinian Authority and even Hamas conditionally in 2017, but it faces repeated Israeli rejection.
Peace and displacement
Information indicates that Trump’s plan includes allowing the Gaza population to voluntarily migrate to other countries, a proposal that has sparked widespread criticism as forced displacement under political cover.
Observers warned that Israel is seeking to impose a new reality in Gaza that resembles the West Bank, by dividing the Strip into isolated cantons and preventing reconstruction except on conditions that cancel the right of return.
These policies, in addition to the ongoing humanitarian crisis, make it difficult to believe the promises of peace without concrete steps to address the suffering of the Palestinians.
Trump’s plan raises questions about its real intentions, on the one hand, may be seen pressure to end the war, expand normalization and support the two -state solution as steps towards peace.
On the other hand, the association of this plan with political interests, such as saving Netanyahu from trial and supporting settlement expansion, raises doubts about the extent of its commitment to the rights of Palestinians.
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza reveals a wide gap between political discourse and field reality, where civilians are killed while they are seeking aid.
These moves represent an ambitious diplomatic move, however, its success depends on its ability to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, ensure the rights of Palestinians, and overcome political contradictions.
Will Trump be the “man of peace”? The answer depends on whether his plan will focus on the interests of the Palestinian people, or will remain a tool for strengthening the political agendas of Netanyahu and its allies.
