Saturday 14/June/2025 – 04:02 PM
The Administrative Court of the State Council ruled a unique ruling to compel the Ministry of Health and the Health Insurance Authority to treat a child of nerve atrophy, and to accept the lawsuit filed by the child’s father.
Obliging the Ministry of Health to treat a child of nerve atrophy
The child’s father filed lawsuit No. 2316 of 12 BC, as a natural guardian of his minor son, against the Minister of Health and the Chairman of the Health Insurance Authority in their capacity.
The lawsuit proved that he needed treatment and submitted a report in his condition to the defendant body to pay the necessary treatment for his son, but it abstained, and he mentioned an explanation of his claim that his son Muhammad suffers from nerve atrophy according to the diagnosis contained in medical reports, and he needs treatment with Elevodys and that the lack of treatment leads to weakness and atrophy of the muscles, inflation and weak heart muscle.
The child’s father added that he was a request to disburse this treatment, and the defendant mourned the path of the defendant in violation of the provisions of the constitution and the law, so he filed his lawsuit with his aforementioned requests, and looked at the urgent incision in the court’s sessions as fixed in its lectures. I decided to refer the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report on the legal opinion in it, and the aforementioned committee deposited a report of the legal opinion in the case, and it was circulated in The present for the state is a defense note, at the end of which the ruling was not accepted not to accept the lawsuit to file it without an adjective in relation to the first pursuit in his capacity, and the present submitted the plaintiffs of two documents from what we were brought in to the origin of the German lam issued by the Fayoum General Hospital regarding the diagnosis of the condition of the victim’s medical son, his birth certificate, the second primary house in the academic year 2025/2024.
The court decided to issue the ruling at today’s session after reviewing the papers and hearing the clarifications and legally deliberation, to accept the case in form, and to cancel the contested decision, and the grammar indicated in the reasons, and the administration’s authority obligated the expenses.
