The Great Sharia Court appealed the ruling of the first degree court to reject a Bahraini lawsuit in which she demanded that her son (20 years) and her 16 -year -old daughter who exceeded the age of choice, and the court said that the two children had settled under the father’s hand; It is with him their interest in continuing to stay under his hand.
The facts of the lawsuit are obtained in what the lawyer Aisha Flamersi, the father of the father, mentioned that he divorced the appellant “his son’s mother” in 2012, and he had a boy from her in 2004 and built in 2008, and they remained under the hands of their mother until they reached the age of adulthood, and the mother’s nursery was dropped in 2014 and they were joined to their father in a judiciary, but she returned in January 2025 to demand that they be joined again, indicating that they had They exceeded the age of choice, and wanted to include them.
In the family reconciliation office, the girl chose to stay with her father and the boy with his mother, and in a later session, lawyer Aisha Flamersi stated that the two children have been in her client since 2014, and their stay with the father has settled since that time.
The husband’s agent indicated to the decision legally that the custody of women ends with the male’s reaching fifteen years, and for the female until she marries and enters the husband; Pursuant to Article No. (124) of the Family Law, and if the female reaches seventeen years, and she did not marry and did not enter the husband, then each of them has the choice to join whom he wants from his parents or who has the right to custody, and she asked to reject the lawsuit.
The court of first degree was sentenced to the refusal of the case, noting that the two children settled their condition under the father’s hand; What is with them is their interest in continuing to stay under the hand of their father, and with him the request of the plaintiff was resided in a non -support from reality and the law in terms of rejection, especially since the girl has chosen residency with her father, and the son’s choice of residence with his mother does not obtain from that; As the court presents the interest of the son and not damaging it accordingly, and then the court decides to reject the case.
The mother stabbed the ruling to appeal before the Sharia Sharia court, but the court stated in the reasons for the ruling that the ruling of the first degree was based on valid and loud reasons, and the court takes it due to the reasons for its ruling, and makes it complementary reasons for it and gave to its judiciary and referred to it, and then the appeal was established on a non -support from reality and the law in contradiction to rejection.
