The Criminal Criminal Court acquitted 25 employees of two hotels of the charge of practicing a company that takes over the management of hotels, and the court said that the defendants were caught in the place where they were issued work permits, and their presence in the place that another company is running that does not violate the law, and does not constitute the crime of practicing work without a permit from the competent authority.
The incident, according to the agent of 22 employees, including the lawyer, Dr. Abdullah Al -Ali gets that one of the employees of the Labor Market Regulatory Authority may go to the two hotels managed by the first accused company, and registered violations on all employees of the two hotel, claiming that they are under the management of the first accused company, and that the employees issued to them work permits on the two hotels, practicing work with that company without a permit.
The prosecution referred the 25 employees, in addition to the company’s official who runs the two hotels to the court, where it was assigned to the latter that he used foreign workers (the accused from the second to the twenty -sixth) without a work permit on them, as evidenced by the papers, and for employees from the second to the twenty -sixth that they practiced work with the first accused without the issuance of a work permit issued to them from the competent authority.
The lawyer Al -Ali submitted a pleading in which he paid the seizure of the cornerstone of the crime, as the defendants had a work permit in the place where they were seized, and at the end of his pleading, the verdict was acquitted of the accused of the charges assigned to them.
The court said in the reasons for the ruling that the constant in the case papers was that in the month of March 2024, the hotel management company represented by the first suspect agreed with the first hotel to manage it, as it agreed in April 2024 with the second hotel as well, and according to those agreements and contracts concluded between them the company is the one who runs those hotels that were arrested by the accused, as it is clear through the extracts of the Labor Market Regulatory Authority that the defendants from the second to the sixth And the twenty have a work permit in the two hotels who were seized in them, when the inspectors visit their business headquarters, and without their violation and work in another place where they were not issued permits, and therefore their work in those hotels that was under the management of another company does not violate the law, and does not constitute a crime of engaging without a permit from the specialized meal, and the court ruled that all the defendants were acquired from what was assigned to them.
