Friday 07/Mar/2025 – 10:49 PM
Tomorrow, Saturday, the Supreme Constitutional Court, headed by Counselor Paul Fahmy, issued a ruling to adjudicate the lawsuit demanding the unconstitutionality of Law 148 of 2019, the Social Insurance and Pensions Law, Article 182 of the same Law and Article 101 of the Evidence Law.
Judgment in the lawsuit not to be constitutionalized by the Social Insurance and Pensions Law
The lawsuit, which carried No. 18 of the year 42 constitutionalism to demand the unconstitutionality of Law 148 of 2019, was the law of social insurance and pensions, and the text of Article 101 of the Evidence Law, given the amounts of the plaintiff’s rights due to appeal that it is not permissible for a precedent to decide in it.
Article 101 of the Evidence Law states that the rulings that have obtained the strength of the judiciary shall be an argument in what it is separated from the rights, and it is not permissible to accept evidence that invalidates this authenticity, but these rulings do not have this authenticity except in a conflict between the opponents themselves without changing their attributes and related to the same right as a place and a reason, and the court decides this authenticity on its own.
