Saturday 04/October/2025 – 10:00 PM
The administrative judiciary of the State Council, tomorrow, will consider the first sessions of the judicial appeal to nullify the amendments to Al -Ahly’s list due to the absence of the rejection field in the vote.
The first sessions of the judicial appeal, invalidating the amendments of the Al -Ahly list
The lawyer, Khaled Suleiman Abu Al -Ela, set up for himself and as a member of the General Assembly of Al -Ahly Club to appeal before the Administrative Judicial Court No. 152 East, against the Chairman of Al -Ahly Club in his capacity, and the Minister of State for Sports Affairs in his capacity, calling for the nullity of the actions of the Special General Assembly held on September 19, 2025 at the club’s headquarters in the island to adopt amendments to the statute regulation.
A judicial stabbing in the State Council invalidated the amendments to the Al -Ahly list due to the absence of the rejection field in voting
The appellant explained that the voting paper that was distributed to the members included only two options: I agree to the proposal as it is, or I agree to the proposal taking into account the following amendment, without providing an explicit category to reject the proposal, which he considered a violation of the members of the free expression of their will.
Abu Al -Ela stressed that this procedure represents a grave defect in the voting process, as it withholding a fundamental alternative is rejection, which contradicts the provisions of the constitution and the law and the statute of the statute of Al -Ahly Club, and makes the voting consequences void.
He pointed out in his lawsuit that Article 87 of the Constitution states that the citizen’s participation in public life is a national duty, and every citizen has the right to vote and express opinion freely, while Article 92 states that the rights and freedoms close to the citizen of the citizen are not acceptable. He also explained that Article 10 of the Al -Ahly regulation confirms that the amendment of any article requires the approval of two -thirds of the members present.
The appellant was based on previous judicial rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Administrative Judicial Court, which confirmed that the integrity of the electoral process requires the provision of complete freedom for the voter in choosing between acceptance and rejection, and that any ballot paper in which real alternatives are obscured by nullity.
