The more I read about the history of the ruling in Bahrain, the more the large amount of the large voids discovered without being written or shed on it or even without being given an opportunity for more understanding and assimilation.
Accidents and stories reported by the scattered books here and there, every writer who limited them to the angle of his own vision, his own color and his own reading of the event, but most of them narrate the accidents and do not stand at their maker, meaning that we miss a lot of humanity, that is, standing at the historical figures that affected the events as human beings, as a father as a husband as a friend as a friend who is a man who is a man who is that man?
Rarely, we find that we care about the human aspects of all its angelic and demonic formations, and its innate divine mixing, that is, the normal human beings created with the same human dough that all of us were created.
Reading situations – any position – private or public away from this human angle remains an incomplete reading, so how influencing the old images when we see them for the first time for people we heard about them in re -reading the situation because you see the event through human features, not through names or dates such as deaf stone.
Pictures of historical characters who are outside their offices or their palaces make you think about the events that they have gone through more humanitarian and make you see the same situations differently if you look at a fixed profile image of that character.
Therefore, I stand a lot at the informal images of His Majesty the great king, may God protect him, especially those in which he is with the citizens, or those that show the patriarchal human side of His Majesty the great king, such as those that were published yesterday while he is with his children and grandchildren, kissing his hand and sitting near him and sharing him with an intimate patriarchal moment.
Because it is one of the indirect means of communication between the ruling and its people, more than it is a picture of the head of a political system and citizens, and the moral difference is a major and has a double effect only needs more reinforcement to perpetuate this image.
The first makes the common factors between the head of the state and the people many and multiple and they are closer to reality and the truth, so it is unjust not to know more about those common denominators between us and him and us and his generous family, the more images of common humanitarian denominations, the more he strengthens this from the national cohesion and made it more prevented and we are fortified and the most important thing is for history that preserves it with all its corners, so do not lose sight of that human angle in a father, son and brother who made a decision here A policy there and worked to preserve interests here and refrain from something there, the humanitarian component between the ruling and its people remains in the memory for the recipient to understand more and absorb more in reading the present and re -reading the past.
