The scene was normal, had it not been for a small moment that revealed everything: a young man advanced for a prominent function; A biographical biography, a sober language, and a presence of confidence. Before you settled the interview; A member of the committee suggested that his digital presence; His public accounts, his recent posts and signs. They did not search for secrets nor for embarrassing sits; All that appeared in a series of signs (admiration) on a sarcastic satirical content at times, and at other times an abuse of sober values that are supposed to be his connection; And comments blessed with a lightness that his written biography is lying. It was not rejected because he made a mistake or two; Rather, because the air suddenly expanded between his speech from itself and its real impact in the world.
Culture, in its true meaning, is not books of books, no written literature, nor suspended slogans; Rather, we are watered from the exact choices that are repeated until it becomes, of course: What do we read? Who are we following? For any speech we give the legitimacy of preference? What behavior we have re -published to become part of the public scene? I mean the culture here: the valuable, the tasteful awareness and the repeated biography that the habit formulates. Culture, in this sense, is not what we memorize, but rather what we repeat until we live and from it.
Ancient philosophy talked about “Hyxis”: an inner body that is created by us. Today, this body takes the form of a compass of taste that feeds from our readings, small provisions and digital interactions. The sign of admiration is not innocent; It is a frequent ballot on what should remain in our psychological and social space. With repetition, this compass is reinforced by the interior maps: what we promise is important, and what we see is “normal” even if it violates our declared values. And when these small voices accumulate, a culture arises either we raise awareness and status, or we will drop us without noise.
The most dangerous thing in culture is that it works silently; A mirror and maker together: reflects what is in us, and restores what we will be. So the saying is believed: Either you hold her reins, or hold it with your reins. He who manages his culture improves the definition of himself: he selects his sources, refuses his tastes, and sets a standard for what deserves to be believed and celebrated. As for those who leave it to the current, he wakes up in an unimaginable image, made by negligence and causing it a vote unanimously.
Culture has a social dimension, no less effective: it is the currency of status in the eyes of people. Neither nicknames nor testimonies alone are what raises one, but rather the harmony of the discourse with the effect and the consistency of values with behavior. A leader whose foundation culture is improved – in the transformed language, in the criteria of appreciation and accountability, in what is rewarded for and what is survey – can change the performance of a full team by changing the climate they breathe. Likewise, the individual: He rises in the eyes of people, not by listing what he believes in; Rather, it shows it with a patient repetition in his daily choices, including a digital effect that is apparently serious. The general taste, in its entirety, is the mirror of the image of the homeland in the eyes of its people and the people.
Someone might say: Are not the algorithms the majority of Sultan than us? indeed; It lures our tastes to what we like and what we want to like. However, we are not without a number or a trick; Cultural will is constructed from a small vow: to follow the inspiration, not the mob, and to pick up what is deepened, not what is distracted, and that we do not grant triviality an instrument that is admired by his emptiness. Those covenants are not an abstract preaching; Rather, engineering is awareness that fortifies our right to be our choice, not what dictates to us. Let us weigh what we publish, and what we like, and what we do with the balance of conscience, belonging and religion: does the meaning increase and value time or dispels it in an unemployed language? Is it preserved our viruses and preserves the image of our homeland, and testifies to our fear and honesty of the word, or is it deducted from our balance with God and with people? Is it damaged with our affiliation that they are associated with us and in the name of our homeland if it is stripped of its context and our name remains on it as a witness, and we are commanded to say good or stigmatized?
