- – Prosecutor’s Chief: The Public Prosecution is the one who is unlikely to publish, provided that the laws of the law are composed
- – The Chief of the Public Prosecution Office: We do not confiscate the right to publish judicial rulings and make them open to the public, provided that the publishing controls are committed
- – The Public Prosecution: The lawyer is the secretary of his clients, and its most basic obligations should not be broken by the secrets of his client, otherwise he was subject to disciplinary penalties according to the law of law
- – Prosecutor: The lawyer justified her actions of investigations of her desire to educate workers in the legal field, despite her approval that the published ruling was not final yet.
- – The Public Prosecution: We are keen on the interest of society first and foremost, and keeping honesty and avoiding the spread of abnormal behaviors in its circles
The third criminal court in its third department considered the session today the lawsuit filed by the Public Prosecution against one of the lawyers after it violated the text of the law by publishing news related to investigations and procedures in a lawsuit attributed to the Sharia court, as the details of the incident to August 2025 are due to the Public Prosecution receiving a notification from the Department of Electronic Crime Control of the General Administration of Combating Corruption and Economic and Electronic Security in the Ministry of Interior They monitored information and news published in electronic newspapers via social media related to investigations and procedures that were made in a legal lawsuit, which is issued by a lawyer entrusted to one of its parties, and when the prosecution began its investigations at the time as soon as she received the communication where the lawyer interrogated, and confronted her with the articles published in the local newspapers, and then ordered the Public Prosecution to refer it to the trial assigned to it the publication of publication publicly for news related On the pretext of lineage in violation of the law. The Public Prosecution was represented in today’s session by the prosecutor, which submitted a visual and oral pleading that included a review of the case evidence, and to scrutinize what was included in the articles published by the lawyer who complained against her, a chapter on the guarantee of the visual pleading of a number of the readers ’comments of these news through social media, through which the prosecutor emphasized the goals of the criminal legislator when the news was published. With investigations and procedures that were carried out in specific cases, not analogy, which is to prevent the publication of the news of marital cases, divorce, custody, alimony, adultery, and proportions, as the legislator aims to prohibit publication to protect the highest ends from publishing and circulation, namely protecting the ties of the family and the ties of family life, and preserving the safety of society and the moral values that arose on it, concluded by the prosecution of the prosecution. It is the one who is the right to publish, provided that the laws of the law are adhered to and in a manner that does not contradict the public good, and as a matter of the first place of the parties to the parties to legal cases. The court decided to postpone the lawsuit to August 31, 2025 for review.
