Al -Ittifaq club management rejected the attempts of Al -Nasr and Al -Ittihad clubs to include the Saudi right -back Radi Al -Otaibi during the 2025 summer transfer period, due to its dissatisfaction with the financial value proposed in the two offers.
Why did the agreement refuse to offer the union?
Al -Sharq Al -Awsat newspaper revealed that the union’s offer included the agreement to agree on the services of the right -back, Fawaz Al -Saqour, in addition to 11.5 million riyals, but that the Fares Al -Dahna administration considered the financial compensation insufficient and announced its final rejection of the offer.
Victory offer was not different from the union
According to the newspaper, the victory of victory was not much better than its counterpart, as it faced the same rejection of the same reason, which is the low financial value. Reports indicated that the management of the eastern club was clear in its adherence to a higher grade of the value of its player.
A possible reciprocal deal between agreement and victory
In another context, Al -Nasr is working to complete a reciprocal deal with the agreement, which requires Abdullah Mado’s move to the latter, in exchange for Bassam Hazazi joining the ranks of the world. In the event that the agreement is completed, Faris Al -Dahna will benefit from dropping the remaining financial dues to victory in the two deals of Khaled Al -Ghannam and Mukhtar Ali.
What are the previous deals between the two clubs?
It is noteworthy that the agreement included Ali Mukhtar from Al -Nasr in the last winter Mercato, and also contracted with Khaled Al -Ghannam in January 2024 of the same club, which makes the settlement of the dues part of any new agreement between the two parties.
