Without a doubt, the last war between Iran and Israel was the most daring to deplete the cognitive stock of the nuclear mind on the two fronts, and to weaken the sources of the scientific flow of each party in the field of atomic excellence. Carefully mutual strikes were designed to target the sources of that knowledge and bomb its strongholds, whether human or material.
The frightening thing is that the dueling on the regional scene between the two nuclear powers does not seem to be directed towards the calm, in light of the continued waving of the mutual threat paper, which is a wave that revolts and fades based on the renewed tendencies of the extremist tendencies and tendencies in expansion and the scattering of the region’s maps, which in turn face a terrible threat to possess nuclear weapons and the obsession of reviewing force, instead of employing this ability and knowledge To produce renewable energy that sings “Zaid’s cows” and achieves the long -awaited development, prosperity and regional calm.
And with the current situation remaining the same, history reminds us that the entry of nations to the adult club to produce nuclear energy is not like out of it; It is a complex process that is subject to many factors, the first of which is the factor of confidence in the new organs, with the need to have a wide base of strategic interests with a common benefit to obtain “nuclear” membership.
Also, breaking the monopoly of the major powers and the developed countries of nuclear technology was not always easy, especially for some countries in the developing world, specifically, whose first attempts began with peaceful purposes, although the implicit intent, in most cases, the use of this technology as a psychological pressure card in possible future scenarios on the path of its “non -peaceful” uses.
For example, Iran’s atomic activity dates back to the 1950s, when the Shah joined an American program called, at the time, “Corn for Peace”, at the initiative of President Eisenhower, to open the doors of new international cooperation and coordination to develop and direct nuclear energy uses towards peaceful purposes, and alert to the need to restrict the spread of nuclear weapons after their catastrophic use of humanity.
The Shah did not stop there. This was encouraged by a “exceptional” western openness to developing the Iranian program as a “innocent” and peaceful program, and there is no fear of its intentions, neither today nor tomorrow.
On this historical background, the current version of the Iranian nuclear program, which was ever seen as in the hands of a strategic ally and a reliable friend. But, for the whole world, it has turned into a great threat and a complex challenge with the reach of technology to the hands of a leadership that suggests adventure and the ambiguity of positions, although the fatwa of the guide, as it is broadcast, is completely forbidden to convert peaceful energy into a deadly weapon.
However, the idea of salvation from the Iranian nuclear program seems to be a fantasy. The program, regardless of its danger, is considered the Iranian interior as part of the Persian prestige, and supporting its revolutionary faith, and a source of pride in its military arsenal. It is a national feeling that escalates after the recent events, and in itself requires a different negotiating tactic to get out of this impasse, and similar to the “face -to -sake” policies that stopped the last war.
Perhaps thinking about establishing a “regional” coalition to produce peaceful nuclear energy – which we have already referred to in this area on the seventh of last April – is a feasible step to give the Iranian program a peaceful capacity and justifications for saving face to move to the negotiating stage. More importantly, finding a new horizon to open up to the countries of the region through such a joint strategic project, in the hope that the fire of the war will be extinguished, and the work is resumed on the benefits of progress, security and stability in terms of change, at least, if not as a matter of moral responsibility in front of a history that will not have mercy on those who do not preach from his lessons, or respect his Sunnah.
* Member of the founder of the circuit of Muhammad Jaber Al -Ansari for thought and culture
