Wednesday 16/July/2025 – 11:19 AM
Dr. Nazir Ayyad, the Mufti of the Republic, received a question from a Muslim scholar in the Western countries, in which he says: I ask your virtue to explain the legal opinion on a advocacy project under the title: “The call to meeting and reject the group”, which is a schedule that includes principles and rules derived from the texts of the book and the Sunnah aimed at establishing the concept of unity, and rejecting the manifestations of division and disagreement between Muslims.
The Honorable Mufti said through the official website of the Egyptian Ifta House: By seeing the presentation and discussion of the generous liquid, and the perceptions of his advocacy, what shows us that the idea of this project is consistent with the principles of Islamic Sharia, and it is consistent with what scholars have gone through the centuries a generation from a generation and a century from behind a century, that the difference of imams is a mercy in the nation And his mercy with them, and that the doctrines of all jurists are routes to the truth, whoever has a path of it.
What accepts the difference and what does not accept it in Islamic law
He continued: If the law of Sharia, its origins and rules are managed, we find that it separated the legal texts in which the difference is not justified, and the jurisprudential rulings based on the deductions of scholars and their jurisprudence, and scholars have considered this a criterion to differentiate between what is accepted by the difference and what does not accept the difference, so they made what the consensus was held on and became known from the religion -whether it is a document that is a document. Originally, or has it become unanimously unanimously over his rule- which is not permissible to violate it and called this type (disagreement) because it constitutes the identity of Islam, and the slander in it is a defamation in the stable religious constants, while those issues that the mujtahids differed from the scholars in its rule and the consensus was not held on it, it expands the multiplicity of opinions and the diversity of sayings, and they called it (difference), The contradiction, its intention is one and the multiplicity is mentioned on the methods of access to it, which is the most jurisprudence.
