Ayman shape
The Great Sharia court ruled, with a Bahraini divorce from her husband, “who are forced” after he refused to spend on her and their two sons, despite the issuance of a ruling on alimony, and his association with illegal suspicious relationships and his dowry, with the testimony of witnesses.
The case is obtained by its facts, while the lawyer Sarah Ali mentioned the wife of the wife, that her client married the defendant in 2018, and she gave birth to two sons, but he is bad in managing his family life not to spend on her and their two sons, and he assaulted her, as he was associated with a relationship with a foreign woman, so she filed a lawsuit in February 2024, and he was sentenced to her in July with allegiance to her and for the children and for her to live in July, and to her in July. But the husband refrained from implementing the ruling, and accumulated an amount of 7530 dinars, and when she faced many problems because of him, she decided to file a lawsuit for divorce from him for not spending.
The court referred the lawsuit to investigate and try to reform the same, and listened to the statements of the witnesses, and the wife submitted pictures and documents showing that the defendant was linked to a foreign mistress, and that he was inside illegal suspicious relationships and is clear and without shame.
The Prosecutor’s agent stated that, because of this, her agent no longer tolerate him at all, and she cannot, and the situation also to continue with him in the marital relationship, while witnesses witnessed proof that he did not want him and his seriousness in reconciliation, and that he promises and leaves his promise to integrity.
The court explained that the defendant husband stated that he refuses to request the plaintiff to divorce, and that he sent them sums and buys the house supplies, and that he resides in the same residence of the marital, and he has witnesses that he spends on the plaintiff, and he asked for a period to bring witnesses, and for the sake of reconciliation and the response, and the court postponed him on that, and in the following session, the Prosecutor’s agent stated that they did not reach a conclusion and that the defendant did not communicate with them, and they did not communicate with them. With him, but he did not respond to their contacts.
The court referred to the decision in the jurisprudence that if the husband refrains from spending, the wife may raise her order to the competent Sharia judge, then he is obliged to one of two things, either spending or divorce, if he refrains from the two things together and it is not possible to spend on her from his money, the judge may release her after her request.
Whereas, the defendant refuses to divorce the plaintiff, in addition to that he did not provide any response, answer, or payment of what the plaintiff presented in the case, not in terms of neglect of his wife and children or his lack of spending on the plaintiff, criminal cases and the rulings issued against him, and what was indicated from the newspaper of the privileges that show his inability to the plaintiff and the children, where most issues occur in infringement of others and their money, and all legal measures have been taken The convict, according to the implementation file.
Also, the defendant is not apparent money that can be implemented by the marriage of the marital from him, and he did not adhere to what he obliged himself in the ruling issued in order to supply the appellant’s expense to the implementation department, but he did not do what indicates his lack of seriousness in the reconciliation, which the court sees that the defendant is still on his position on refraining from spending on his claimant wife despite his left.
The court ruled to divorce the plaintiff from the defendant, a clear shot for the lack of spending, and he is not entitled to refer to it except with a new contract and dowry, and she has no marriage with another man except after the rhythm of the divorce format, and the end of the legal kit.
