After purchasing a commercial record of a company to sell foodstuffs, Bahraini discovered that he was accused in a criminal case of not being disclosed by the company’s assets, movables and money, because the first owner sold the company when he was unable to pay its accumulated debts, and the minor court acquitted Jupiter, confirming the absence of his attribute to the debt, and therefore he does not imagine the possibility of disclosing the absence of his relationship with the implementation file. The defendant gets that his client wanted to open a project to sell food in Muharraq, so someone offered him to buy a record of a standing store and his customers, and he found it an appropriate opportunity, and he purchased the record from its owner without reviewing the history of the company and what it has and what it has, believing that he bought a famous commercial name, but he was surprised by his summons to the police station to a report against him as the owner of the commercial registry of the shop By filing a lawsuit against the company regarding his financial dues at a value of 9200 dinars, and obtained a ruling and opened an implementation file with the implementation court, then submitted a communication against the company and its owner on charges of refraining from disclosing the assets and funds of the company in the city. On the disclosure of what the second defendant, the “company”, is from the money if he is an owner and responsible for it, and the company has committed the crime in question, the first charge in its name, its account and its benefit, and the result of the first defendant’s behavior was if he was a responsible owner. The debts, assets, and funds that the company. The court indicated in the reasons for the ruling to the law decision that the trial court may decide on the innocence when it doubts the validity of the accusation of the accused or the lack of evidence of evidence, and said that it has surrounded the facts of the case from the eyesight and insight that came out of the existence of there is certain evidence that the court reassures that the first accused committed the charge assigned to him where he decided that he was a modern owner Implementation has no attribute in it, which is what the court has realized by reading the ruling of the civil lawsuit related to the file of implementation and the fixed in it.
