The Great Administrative Court rejected a lawsuit against a specialized hospital, asking him to pay compensation for the birth of a child to a mother who suffers from a sclerosis, who was diagnosed with damage to the brain before birth, with severe suffocation and brain disorder and died 3 months after his birth, and the court said that she was reassured about the report of the National Authority for Regulating Health and Services (Nahr), which ended in the absence of a medical error in the treatment provided to the deceased son.
On the details of the lawsuit, lawyer Mohamed Al -Mannai, the hospital undersecretary, stated that the prosecutors held their lawsuit, calling on the hospital and doctors supervising the process of solidarity and solidarity to perform 5100 dinars for them as a matter The medical error of not following the accepted medical assets during the birth process for the first prosecutor.
They explained that the first prosecutor had entered the hospital with a single pregnancy in the week (39) and she is pregnant with the sick cell disease, the “sclerosis” had an emergency caesarean section due to the umbilical drooping and organic rupture of the membranes. The result of the process of the birth of a flat head with a pale face without a respiratory effort and does not hear the heartbeat, and all laboratory tests were taken and gave the necessary medicines with the use of the necessary devices for his condition Under the supervision of a full medical team, the diagnosis of his health condition was damaged before birth with severe suffocation and invertebrate brain disorder with a lack of oxygen, and the child was transferred to Al -Salmaniya Hospital, where he died 3 months later.
Prosecutors filed a complaint with the National Authority for the Regulatory of Health Professions and Services (Nahr) against the defendants, which ended in achieving that there was no medical error in the treatment submitted to their deceased son, but the prosecutors did not accept the result of the report, and they stabbed him with grievance and filed the lawsuit.
In the reasons for the ruling, the court said that it reassures what the technical committee’s report to report the professional and moral errors of the profession of human medicine (a river) has ended with the conclusion of its lead:- ((The committee ended with the consensus of the members present that a medical error was not proven by the treating doctors))- which is due to the absence of the error corner by the defendants, which is what the case sacrificed without a chain The prosecutors raised the request to restore the complaint to the National Authority for the Regulation of Health Professions to form another technical committee to reconsider the complaint and issue a medical report in it, and the court turned this request, the court ruled to reject the lawsuit, and obligated the prosecutors to expenses and the law fees.
