The Sharia court rejected a lawsuit filed by a Bahraini against his wife calling for her to return to the marital home, after it was proven to the court that he was not safe to repeat his assault and expel her from the house, where he asked the court to compel her to return to his father’s house in Hamad City and not the marital home. The lawyer Zainab Issa, the agent of the defendant, stated that the plaintiff filed his wife to the lawsuit to compel him to the claim of the defendant. The object in Hamad City, explaining that the defendant is his wife for the correctness of the legal contract under the document of a marriage contract and entered it and tenth cohabitation with the husbands, and gave birth to him on the matrimonial bed two sons, but she left the marital residence at the beginning of December 2023 without right or legal justification, and she refuses to refer to it despite the multiple friendly attempts. The defendant is not honest, the attack on her by constantly beaten and expelled from the house, and urged her to resort to the courts, in addition to the fact that the title in which she resides with the plaintiff differs from the title contained in the final requests of the plaintiff. “If this was not the case, he did not request her return to the address of his father’s house, and not on the address in which she was residing with, with his knowledge of the large number of problems between them and them, the court issued its introductory ruling, and before deciding on the issue by referring the lawsuit to investigate so that the defendant can prove all the legal proof methods, including the legal environment that her prosecutor’s husband harmed her, The same ways. ” The wife of the wife’s mother witnessed that the defendant is his wife’s daughter, who is retired from work, and stated that he was a means of reform in many of the problems that happen between them, and she was represented in beating, insults and expulsion, and he did not see him hitting her, but he saw the effects of beating on her body, and when facing him, he acknowledged that he was agitated and assaulted by beating, and that he was one time and before the last problem between them, he called him and told him that he had relationship “Take your daughter, and if you did not take her, I will expel her from the house.” The witness added that “the plaintiff is asking for a divorce, so he contacted him and spoke to him and offered him to be the separation as an agreement, then he sent a reconciliation agreement to the defendant and we amended and sent to him and then we were surprised that he refused to divorce, and she is currently residing in her mother’s house, and filed a notification against him in the police station He expelled her. Marital), and confirmed that obedience is the right of the husband to his wife, and her condition is that she was not deliberately harmed by saying or actually. Unacceptable legally unless it is due to a kind of proof, and therefore the plaintiff’s lawsuit was filed on an incorrect basis of reality, law and law, which is with which he must judge with rejecting the lawsuit.
