Zahra Habib
The murderer bought a knife a few days ago and devoted to the observation of his deceased neighbor
The Public Prosecution demanded in its final pleading before the first major criminal court to impose the maximum punishment against the accused of the case of the Al -Shakhura killer, which is a crime that exceeded its details and motives, all that our society encountered from the Sunnahs of the crime, and all the exaggeration of the destination, the act of the act, the municipality of the emitter, and the weakness of the soul, as it described it in its pleading yesterday.
The prosecution said that it is subjected to the lawsuit, and it carries a shameful weights and great consequences, so its mission will not stop at the point of claiming and explaining the defendants’ faults and creating his crime, but before that, and based on its representation of society, it is drawn attention to taking into account his tolerant nature, and his valuable legacy that is deeply striking in history. She added, “This good people were not a hardship; From what this accused did, and it becomes an individual of him prey to him, and society becomes an arena for that pillar, except from the negligence of it, which allowed the departure of the natures of this society and its generous characteristics, and by the generosity of the souls that God has forbidden … so that the accused comes out to us, spreading panic and panic, and with a chill for him.
And the prosecution began to recover in its pleading with all its exact details, as if it was drawing the features of the crime through the words, and it says that after a slight dispute between him and the victim, the accused in himself was permanently disposing of him, and he was determined to do so, and he intended the tight planning to commit his crime. The accused bought a sharp knife from a shop before the incident, and devoted days to monitoring the movements of the victim and studying his daily habits to find out the most appropriate time to carry out his crime.
On the morning of Thursday, February 27, 2025, this accused saved his plan to kill the victim in light of this insistence. And it monitors the victim, holding his knife and equipped with precision and criminal skill, wearing gloves to avoid leaving any fingerprints, and hid in the parking lots adjacent to the victim’s house, waiting for his exit.
After the victim appeared in the front yard of the house, the accused pounced on him, where he was directed to him seven separate stab wounds in vital areas of his body, which caused severe bleeding that led to complete damage in the internal vital organs, and that each of themselves was sufficient to cause immediate death. After committing the crime, the accused showed unusual nerves, as he disposed of all material evidence, and he threw the knife used in the crime in the garbage container behind the adjacent building.
He removed the gloves, and threw them in the same place, as well as got rid of the black jacket that he was wearing while committing the crime, before fleeing fleeing the scene of the accident on foot.
The prosecution affirmed that the accused’s felony constitutes the crime of intentional murder accompanied by the precedent of persistence and monitoring as two strict circumstances, which are affected by Article 333 of the Penal Code, and a reason for the tightening of the penalty to death. The statements of the witnesses of evidence, including the witness, who saw the same at the moment of the accused’s attack on the victim, were invalidated by the victim and tried to strangle him before he brutally stabbed him.
While the testimony of one of the neighboring residents comes to certify that certificate, that while he was in his apartment overlooking the location of the incident, he ended his hearing of a screaming voice, and when he appeared, he saw the accused coming out of the positions corresponding to his home and with his hand a knife containing the effects of a red color, which later showed that it was examined as the blood of the accused. He adds that he saw the accused, as he got rid of the jacket that he was wearing his clothes and the tools used in the crime, and when he went to seek the matter, the victim witnessed lying on the ground, and he was surrounded by blood.
The confessions of the accused, which is a unique model in explaining how the crime is compromised in its details, is what other evidence has ended in its various types, so that the evidence is supportive with an authentic, indispensable or ambiguous.
The pathologist witnessed, and that with the apparent examination of the body it was found that there was a stab in the left of the neck and three stabs in the chest and a stab in the loin and two stabs in the back, and it was found that there are definitive injuries in the front, the scalp, nose and hands, and that the main cause of death is the stab wounded injuries that the victim was subjected Appeals.
The prosecution added in its pleading: As for the confessions of the accused, he confessed in the investigations that he was determined and planned to kill the victim by buying the knife, and monitored the time of the victim’s exit from his residence, and on the day of the incident he monitored him and directed several stab wounds to him by the seized knife, and decided that he did so with the intention of revenge as a result of the differences that were between them.
It was commented on the testimony of his brother and the defendant’s defense in the trial sessions that he was not responsible for his actions, and the prosecution confirmed that investigations are cut off that this defense was not valid.
The defendant’s brother decided to investigate that the accused was being treated from mental illness, but since more than ten years, he has a good health condition. The prosecution, despite this, and in order to achieve the principle of justice, presented the accused to the microcredit judge regarding his presentation to a tripartite committee to explain the extent of his responsibility for his actions and statements to the incident, and the committee ended, decisively to prove his responsibility His actions during the crime.
