Ayman shape
After documenting her, and granted her a public attorney, the woman tried to acquire a property for her husband without his knowledge, which sparked his anger and divorced her, but she claimed that he was lost to eligibility, and filed 3 cases in front of the litigation levels to try to stone him, to end attempts in the Court of Cassation to reject her request and support the first ruling and appeal.
According to the attorney’s attorney Ahmed Al -Jawlan, the former wife was residing with his client throughout the previous years until October 2024, and he is with his full mental and cognitive senses, and he made a public attorney to dispose of her, and she had his bank card, so she filed a lawsuit to issue a loss allowance for a real estate document, which sparked the husband’s anger, and made him move to live with his children and divorced her, so she filed a lawsuit before the court, so she filed a lawsuit before the court, so she filed a lawsuit before the court, so she filed a lawsuit before the court, so she filed a lawsuit before the court. She asked the ruling on the ruling of the stone against the defendant retroactively from October 2024, and said that the defendant is her husband in the correct legal contract, and that she was the one who cares about his affairs and his care, and that he was recently injured in dementia, and that he was seat and unable to conduct financial actions and power, so she filed her lawsuit, but the court rejected the lawsuit.
The wife did not surrender, and stabbed the ruling on appeal, and said that his children prevented her from seeing him, as the husband’s children came, and they presented the court what confirms that he divorced her since November 2024, while the husband’s agent emphasized the bad intention of the appellant; Because she took advantage of the power of attorney issued by the appellant against him, and she filed a lawsuit to issue an instead of a real estate document without his consent and by claiming that he suffers from a mental scourge that prevents him from behaving.
The Court of Appeal stated that the husband appeared before the court of first degree in his person, and the court interrogated him and assigned him herself, with the report of the medical committees that stated that there is a physical disability, without standing on the existence of a mental disability, and therefore the court and the authority and what it formed from the doctrine through the foregoing; She ruled to reject the lawsuit, and her ruling came correct, and she refused to appeal the appeal.
However, the previous wife did not despair and went to the Court of Cassation to appeal the previous two rulings, as the court confirmed that the contested ruling in support and complementary of the primary ruling had decreed the request of the appellant to sign the stone against the contested against him, based on the conclusion of the other case papers, and the court stood on the perfection of his mind and instructed him from his discussion if he appeared before him with his person, and the court concluded that the health status of the first person is not against him. It requires the rhythm of the stone on him, and then he is able to manage its affairs, and that his actions are justified and there is no exit on the familiar custom and there is no violation of it because of the necessity of reason and law.
The court added: What was concluded by the ruling came, describing its fixed origin in the papers, and it is sufficient to carry its judiciary, and the implicit response included the objection to which the appellant raises the reasons for the appeal, which is nothing more than an objective debate in the authority of the trial court that it is not permissible before this court, which is with which the entire appeal is on a non -basis; Which must not be accepted.
