While Gaza is groaning under the rubble of homes and memory, and human rights forums are bored with documented Israeli war crimes, suddenly confrontation with Iran is suddenly jumped to the forefront of the scene, to take the hand of the Middle East towards the edge of the danger, only seven days were enough to turn the equations; From an attack to a comprehensive regional war that foreshadows nuclear pelvis and an unprecedented geopolitical crisis.
But the deeper question amid missile smoke: Is Israel trying, through this confrontation, conveyed the connection of global attention away from its legal accountability in Gaza? Do you seek to reproduce her image as a threatened victim, not as an aggressor? The data indicate that the major blow to Iran was not only a proactive response to a nuclear threat, but part of the process of re -mediating, and the imposition of a new psychological reality that reflects the force in an injustice template.
On the other hand, Tehran was not silent; It launched more than 400 ballistic missiles and 1500 drones, and announced a new stage of missile deterrence, stressing that the nuclear project was not just a technical choice, but rather a sovereign paper and a geopolitical message stating: We are not marginalized in post -American domination equations.
But this confrontation is not a traditional war between two powers, but rather a battle that devoured the entire region, threatens its food, energy, and digital security. More than 40% of the missile platforms, and 15 thousand central expelled devices were damaged in Iran, while nearly 600 people were killed, including nuclear scientists, but in Israel, 25 people were killed, more than 800 people were wounded, and more than 800 people were wounded, and more than 800 people were injured, and more than 800 people were injured, 18 thousand reports of damage, and the direct economic cost amounted to about 1.5 billion dollars.
Behind all this, the people stand afraid, lost, suspended between the rubble of the country and the waiting shelters, the war is not a friend of anyone, nor their parties are desirable from the Gulf states, which have always chosen the approach to development and stability rather than adventure and conflicts.
Here, Bahrain, as a large country, appears in its vision, through its membership in the International Economic Security Council, and its calm diplomatic moves, Manama is working to create an accurate balance between internal security and regional participation, raised its cybersecurity, strengthening its food security, and encouraged through the Gulf coordination on initiatives to calm regional.
What distinguishes Bahrain and the rest of the Gulf states is its awareness that the major wars begin with a limited action, but it ends with a catastrophe that does not remain or vow. Therefore, the adoption of a Gulf ceasefire initiative, and the proposal of a “regional conference to calm”, with an international alliance to protect civilian nuclear facilities, is the third possible rational solution.
At this critical moment, the role of peoples in restoring the compass is manifested: the true enemy is not the other geographical, but poverty, ignorance, extremism, and the United Nations should not be satisfied with playing the role of the observer, but rather to activate the mechanisms of human protection and provide new collective security initiatives that place man at the heart of the decision.
In a time when the heat of the earth and the human being rises, we need someone to cool the fire of political madness, and in a moment when the missiles are racing, we need those who precede them in the mind, with the word, and with conscience, this is not the battle of victorious, but a moment of rescue .. for those who remain from the dream, and for those who still believe that peace is not just a truce between two wars, but a moral and strategic option that is indispensable.
* Media and academic researcher
