Within the framework of following up the developments of the case regarding the commercial fraud attributed to Al -Daisi Markets Company LLC; Counselor Wael Rashid Boulay, Assistant Attorney General, stated that the Public Prosecution did not publish the names of the accused as hesitated, but rather the pronounced of the possession of the accused in that case quantities of corrupt food commodities expired, and their forgery of validity data on them and offering them for sale and trading, she saw the publication of information related to what the goods and their source, this information was represented in the name of the commercial facility And its warehouse, in which these facts were committed, and the expired goods were distributed through them and their name, and that was to inform citizens and residents to take care and caution and prevent the treatment of food commodities attributed to that company and refrain from consuming it, to protect them and preserve public health and to avoid the expected damage to the circulation and consumption of these corrupt food commodities, at the time when the specialists begin At the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the implementation of the prosecution’s decisions to limit and control what was circulated in the market and the supply of them for sale, especially since the ministry’s report has indicated that among those commodities has expired three years ago, and some of these food items are meat varieties.
In this context, he added that the Public Prosecution, although it was able to control the company’s sales outlets with its decisions, but the fear of the presence of corrupt goods in the possession of citizens and residents and the possibility of consuming them; The prosecution called for the announcement of its source by publishing the name of the company and its warehouse data based on the distribution in the markets, and this was using the right to publish the law in accordance with the advocate of Article 246 of the Penal Code, and because of its ability to public interest, and to pay the risks of a case and possible damages that are difficult to correct people.
This is with regard to the facts that some circulated by the saying that the Public Prosecution did not publish the names of those accused in it, similar to what they did in the case, the subject of the ongoing prosecution investigations, it is worth noting that these facts were limited to controlling the violation and the material materials of the crime, and the criminal activity in it did not extend to the promotion of items or goods in the crime, as is the case in the case in the case, in which the promotion, circulation and display of food commodities were proven in The markets, which obligated the prosecution to initiate publication to protect citizens and residents and maintain public health.
