Thursday, May 29/2025 – 11:17 am
The competent court has set June 23, to consider the accused’s appeal of Yassin, Damanhur’s student, on the sentence against him in life imprisonment.
The first circle deposited Damanhur’s crimes, the reasons for its ruling in the case 33773 of 2024 crimes of the Damanhour Center against the accused, P.C.
The reasons for the judgment on the accused of the joke of the student, Yassin
The ruling was issued under the chairmanship of Counselor Sherif Kamel Mustafa, President of the Court, membership of Advisors Ahmed Hassouna Azab and Adham Mohamed Saeed, in the presence of Ahmed Othman Salim, the Deputy Public Prosecutor, and the Secretariat of Mr. Abdel -Mawgoud Al -Waziri.
The court said in its reasons, that the accused achieved his sordid sexual desire, trying to enter him until he spent his unbridled lust repeating that he did more than once, taking advantage of the modernity of the child’s age, outside his action from normal for human instinct, and he was slaughtered with his crime, his child Attachment.
Al -Muhannah in the reasons for the judgment was completed by the recklessness of the student Yassin, that the child’s attempts and his crying from the dismantling of him did not succeed or repel him from him, so he was subjected to him and his peace.
And if the age of the one who was imposed on the aforementioned crime was not reached 18 years old, or the perpetrator or one of its perpetrators was stipulated in the second paragraph of Article 267, the penalty will be stressed for a period of no less than 7 years, and if these two circumstances meet together, he will be sentenced to life imprisonment, given that the victim is a child, pursuant to the court of the text of Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
Since the court is about the evidence that it was assured of the evidence that it has led and the support of the evidence and the technical evidence that was comfortable with it as advanced, and then it takes the accused with what she concluded from these evidence, reassuring her from the acquaintance of the victim’s child on the accused during the legal presentation, and the truth of her witnesses, and what was proven in the forensic report and the testimony It is that it is only a miserable and miserable means of salvation from the charge assigned to him, as it is not intended to disavow the accusation and impunity, which is what justice refuses and the court rejects.
