Ayman shape
After approximately 4 years of agreement, the Civil Grand Court obligated a Bahraini to pay 10 thousand dinars for Bahraini with which he agreed to buy a digital currency mining machine at the end of 2021, but it did not abide by the agreement, and refused to return the amount, and the court obliged her to expenses the lawsuit and in exchange for law fees.
In the details of the lawsuit, the lawyer, Muhammad al -Mahdi, the prosecutor, explained that his client agreed with the defendant on 7/12/2021 on the process of selling the digital currency mining machine between them, provided that he delivered the agreed amount, and that the defendant, the owner of the individual institution, delivered the machine during the month of February 2022, and the plaintiff paid an amount of 9970 dinars to the defendant according to the attached balance issued by The defendant, dated 12/20/2021, and Al -Malade, signed the latter with the seal of its individual institution.
The prosecutor waited for a long time to receive the digital mining machine, except that after the agreed period expired, he did not receive it, so he sent a notice to the defendant that the sale should be delivered, but to no avail, which led him to file a complaint with the Consumer Protection Department, which initiated the complaint and referred it to the Public Prosecution, where a criminal order was issued to fined the defendant at the amount of a thousand dinars, so it was an objection to the criminal order The Criminal Criminal Court refused to object and supported the fine.
Lawyer Al -Mahdi presented to the Civil Court a copy of the criminal order and the balance of the agreement, while the court indicated what was settled by the ruling of the Court of Cassation that “the authoritarian order before the civil judiciary after his final process is obligatory for not being objected to during the legally prescribed time,” and said that the fixed order of that criminal order against the defendant on the charge of not returning in exchange for service under the contract, and the matter was supported, and the ruling was not appealed.
The court added, that this constitutes a deliberate mistake contrary to the law, proven by the defendant, definitely and certainly, according to the evidence that the judiciary has adopted, which has become permanent The lawsuit and the consumer protection department complaint that the defendant receives an amount of 9970 dinars from the plaintiff in exchange for bringing in a mining machine, and it is fixed according to the receipt of an appendix to sign its signing and the seal of its institution that was not stabbed with it with a stabbed, and the court requires that the latter be obligated to the amount of “9970 dinars” and obligated it to the case expenses and in exchange for law fees.
