The reality says that the history of man is the work of its present, and that the sane person is the one who looks at history as an incentive to build the future, not as a burden on every occasion to whiten his sheets or fabricate his facts; Then his past fighters and vowed to reproduce his mistakes.
And the history, which Ibn Khaldun described by saying: “On its face, it does not exceed the news, but in its interior view and investigation.” He has risen in his introduction to a stand -alone philosophical science, not only to study the conditions of human beings, but to devise the meanings of those conditions and put them under observation in the laboratories of time, so that his active powers can quote the best experiences and leave their worst.
“Historical event” by Ibn Nabi
There is a secret recipe – an additional – to keep history as a motivation for the awakening of human awareness and for responsible abuse with the transformations of the times, to avoid falling into the category of forgotten.
I found this recipe in the works of the Algerian Malik bin Nabi, one of the most prominent thinkers of the twentieth century, which he called “historical event”, and considered it the true measure of the effectiveness of living nations in the reality of events, instead of being just a recipient. On the other hand, its person should rise with his consciousness, concepts and interactions with his surroundings, so that a reality does not fall into a reality that drains his right to exist.
Theoretically, Ibn Nabi, who focused on the essence of his actions on “reforming man” as a criterion for building Islamic societies with cultural standards, believes that adopting the concept of “historical effectiveness” in the life of societies and their human interactions that makes it a “maker” of civilization and is able to achieve the renaissance, whenever it adheres to the conditions of the four rise: preparing human consciousness, producing ideas and applying them, creating innovative investment For resources, respect for work time.
Historical Decision: Revival Barel
In fact, and from our point of view, this ideal recipe for “historical effectiveness” must be associated with what can be called “historical courage” or “historical decisiveness”, to isolate the reactionary and dark currents of society that weaken the will of its members, and pushes them to weakness, despair and delay from reality, ignoring the wrath of history on those who flounder in challenging their years, failing or ignoring Read his variables.
And I believe that the historical courage in such situations requires a supernatural ability to overcome the solid and bidding ego, which we see embodied in specific cases in the Arab reality, such as those that adopt the idea of armed resistance outside the scope of the legitimate state, which do not recognize it at all, and do not realize, in turn, when it stops “whitening” its actions and claiming to excel at the expense of its victims, as it insists on restoring historical conflicts And its funeral, instead of directing its potential to engage in construction battles, not demolition.
The Palestinian issue: the priority of decisiveness
The decisive factor at this critical historical stage to address the Palestinian issue has become an imposition of an eye on all actors to save what can be saved before it is too late. As there was no humiliation except and it occurred, and there was no humiliation except that and the fate of millions is still left to the wind.
Therefore, the commitment to promises and covenants in the Palestinian affairs to remove the “issue” from its predicament is a priority of priorities, and the wise men should return the “Beijing Agreement” to the light again, in order to achieve a “actual” and emergency national unity that imposes itself as a legitimate aspect of the Palestinian right, and lifted the body of the “issue” the weight, misery and torture of the seventh of October, and all the past defeats.
Without this step, which is not easy, the beneficiaries of the agitation will continue to fuel, and who are boasting about underestimating the “two -state solution” under the pretext of dividing the same house on itself, while the poor commanded them to be entrusted to the Lord of the reasons.
In conclusion: History is ruthless
Ultimately, historical sacrifices must rise to the level of this humanitarian catastrophe, so that history does not die in the past. History, as an eyewitness to the past, also remains a strict judgment on the present and future days. And the one who learns from his experiences!
*Member of the founder of the circuit of Muhammad Jaber Al -Ansari for thought and culture
