The Civil Court rejected a lawsuit filed by a Gulf company on its Bahraini counterpart by adding the executive formula to a ruling issued in its country, regarding the Bahraini company’s failure to supply children’s games to the Gulf, which was concluded in the Gulf Court.
The lawsuits of the lawsuit, according to the agent of the Bahraini company, the lawyer, Abeer Abbas, indicated that the prosecutor, a Gulf company, established its lawsuit and at the end of it requested the ruling to add the executive formula to the ruling issued to it in the registered appeal and the issuance of the order to implement it in the Bahraini courts, to be in the face of the company and its owner with their obligation to fees and expenses and in exchange for actual law fees.
The claimant company stated that it had collected a relationship and commercial transactions between it and the company, which was represented in the company and its owner to supply a group of children’s games and other equipment and machines for the plaintiff, but the defendant had taken their contractual obligations; This prompted the plaintiff to go to the judiciary in its state to request compensation for the damage to it.
Lawyer Abeer Abbas explained that during the circulation of the lawsuit in the sessions, the defendant communicated with the plaintiff, and they agreed among themselves to end the conflict in peace, and a settlement agreement was issued between them, and that agreement was submitted to the courts in the state of the plaintiff, and they agreed to make that agreement in the power of the executive bond, and the ruling was issued to the Court of Appeal and the judge to cancel the ruling and prove the conciliation concluded between the two parties according to the agreement.
She added: Although the ruling has become final, the plaintiff has established her current lawsuit in order to eliminate her requests, while she referred to the course of the articles of implementation law, which states that “the rulings and orders issued in a foreign country may be implemented by the same conditions prescribed in the law of that country to implement the rulings and orders issued.”
It is not permissible to implement the implementation except after verifying that the Bahraini courts are not concerned with the dispute in which the ruling or the matter was issued, and that the foreign courts issued by it are competent in accordance with the rules of international judicial jurisdiction established in their law.
She said that the ruling or the matter has acquired the final degree in accordance with the law of the court that issued it, and does not contradict the ruling or order that was previously issued by the courts of the Kingdom of Bahrain, noting the text of Article 1 of the agreement to implement rulings, news and judicial declarations of the Gulf Cooperation Council states, as each of the member states of the Cooperation Council implemented the rulings issued by the courts of any member state; In civil, commercial, administrative, and personal status issues; The force of the order to decide in its territory; According to the procedures stipulated in this agreement, if the court that issued the ruling is competent, in accordance with the rules of international judicial jurisdiction, scheduled for the state to which the implementation is required, or if it was competent in accordance with the provisions of this agreement. The court ruled to reject the plaintiff’s lawsuit, obligate her with expenses, and in exchange for law fees.
