The Great Civil Court obligated a Bahraini citizen and an insurance company, to lead to a bicycle driver in solidarity an amount of 17 thousand dinars in compensation for what happened due to a traffic accident in which the driver of the insured car caused, and it left a permanent deficit of 25%, while obliging them with legal interest 3% annually from the date of the judicial demand to complete payment, fees, translation expenses and medical committees fees and the fees of law.
The agent of the bicycle driver, lawyer Mohamed Al Mahdi, indicated that the accident occurred in July 2021, when the first defendant was leading her insured vehicle with the second defendant, and collided with the plaintiff while leading his bicycle, and he was subjected to fractures and injuries, and the first defendant was referred to the Criminal Criminal Court, where a conviction sentence was issued against her.
The bike driver submitted the case before the Lesser Civil Court, calling for material and literary compensation for what was afflicted by the accident, and the court ruled that it was not jurisdiction valuable to the case, referring it to the Civil Court, and remained the dismissal of the expenses. The lawyer, Mahdi, decided to decide the discrimination, noted that “the ruling issued in the criminal articles shall have an authenticity in the civil lawsuit before the civil courts whenever it has been separated by a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the action component of the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits, and in the legal description of this action and its lineage to its perpetrator, if the criminal court is separated in these matters, then it is refrained from the civil court She adheres to her in discussing the civil rights related to it, ”and he said that the first defendant against her was sentenced to the conviction of the error and did not oppose the ruling, and it was the act that caused the incident in which the criminal ruling was issued, and the court is obligated to abide by his pilgrimage.
The report of the medical committee stated that the plaintiff was injured in the scalp with bleeding that necessitated the preparation, sewing, transportation of two blood blood units, and concussion, with bleeding in the ears, and was subjected to friction burns in both the right side of the face, the right arm and the top of the abdomen.
