Mr. Dr. Firas Muhammad
Most of the official and unofficial councils are almost without that person who found, to carry out his offensive operations on every dialogue, which ends with his occupation and control over the ongoing dialogue, why? Do not know, but he achieved a kind of control.
Sometimes, and when you are in a council, you think for a while that you will exchange opinions by your action for a topic or your participation in it, and you will listen to more than one opinion, and if you find yourself in a distant dialogue battle, one of its parties speaks in everything, and provides every speaker, a type of human being finds himself the official spokesman for everything, the content of what he says is as much as he is interested in saying, usually this type of human being who does not aim Attacking I asked him to stop and allow you to complete your conversation, this considered an attack on his sovereign borders and the beginning of invasion, in fact he does not listen to what is going on, but rather awaits his role in speech, which is a renewed role that ends, while the tone of voice and body movements, it is an independent stadium, and it is interrupted with signs and tone To you: Why do not you leave an opportunity for others to speak!, This type exists even on social media, so he does not leave a conversation or an opinion except and comment on it, and usually enters with a comment like “Let’s be realistic” to start after him by telling the imagination that comes to mind in those moments, a fantasy far from reality, but it is presented in a strong voice and a high tone.
Control of the dialogue may indicate in cases the confidence of the speaker, when it has a necessity, and it is in its place, but with this type of human being that we talked about, it is often far from trust and the reason for the fear of hearing a contrary opinion far from his directions, or it changes his image to others, so you always find him trying to persuade others, and does not want to be convinced without his convictions, the bad impact of this model falls on the children and young people who attend these councils, they do not They are raised that listening is an art that must be mastered, but rather that those who speak more understand more, and that the quick responses occupy dialogues.
In conclusion, if you cannot listen, then your modern alternative is not your modern alternative, and if you do not have the courage to listen to those who disagree with you, then your alternative is not to claim that you are the owner of the right that everyone should know, so dialogue and talk is a partnership and exchange, and not a struggle to survive.
* Dean of the College of Law – Gulf University
