After receiving the medical materials that she requested for more than 11 thousand dinars, she refused to pay the entitled Hospital for the supplier company, and her agent came before the court to defend the documents, but the court replied that the hospital did not deny the signing attributed to its followers or the seal attributed to it on the documents, and obligated it to pay the amount, the benefits, fees, and in exchange for the legal fees.
According to the lawyer, Abdul Rahman Ghoneim, the company’s agent, the latter raised her claim against a hospital, and stated that she received medical materials to the hospital at her request, and she was monitored in her amount of 11374 thousand dinars, which she failed to pay, despite notifying her of the necessity Until complete payment, while obliging them to fees and expenses and for the fees of law.
The agent of the company submitted a copy of the request for granting credit facilities for the benefit of the defendant hospital within the amount of 15 thousand dinars, and a period of payment of up to 60 days, indicating the signature of his issuance to the authorized to sign the defendant. He concluded his level of issuance to her, in addition to copies of the purchase orders attributed to the defendant, which included the request for purchasing medical materials from the plaintiff, and copies of bills issued by the plaintiff to demand the value of the materials supplied to the defendant with a total amount of 11374 dinars, indicating the signature of his issuance to the defendant’s followers in a way Prosecutor of the defendant to urge her to pay the claim amount.
The defendant’s agent submitted a defense note in which he adhered to all the photos and documents submitted by the plaintiff, and asked to reject the lawsuit and obligate the plaintiff to the expenses, while the prosecutor’s agent submitted a memorandum of response in which he adhered to the non -authenticity of the payment submitted by the defendant to dedicate the documents to not deny the signature or seal on it. And the lack of denying the receipt of the materials. And that the plaintiff is ready to submit the original documents if the court sees it.
The court referred to the Court of Cassation regarding the payment submitted by the defendant to dedicate the light image of the documents that “the customary editor is considered an argument for the one who signed it with the facts that he had as long as he did not deny his signing of it, or challenge his forgery.” And for one of her followers. It was not stabbed by the signature or seal with any stabbed. The contractual relationship with the plaintiff or her receiving the medical materials did not deny the claim. Hence, this does not waste her pilgrimage in confronting her as long as she did not dispute the signature or seal that she touched, and she did not explicitly conform to her conformity to the assets taken from it by a statement of non -conformity.
The court added: The saying in general with the shame or the lack of conformity is not fulfilled by the effect of that payment, which is with him that the defendant’s payment is not based on a bond that must be paid to, as Article No. (13) of the evidence of evidence states that (the customary editor is considered to be issued by those who signed it unless he explicitly denies what is attributed to him from a line, signature, seal or fingerprint), The papers are a denial of signing in the customary paper or stabbed their content with any stabbing that its effect is that it is an argument, whether in terms of its issuance from the site on it, or in terms of the validity of what was stated in it.
And since that, it was the constant of the court from the case papers, and from the bills issued by the plaintiff to demand the value of the materials supplied to the defendant with a total amount of 11374 dinars, and the defendant had represented a prosecutor about it, and her defense was limited to the documents of the documents, and there was no payment of a payment or a defense from them, and she did not deny the signature attributed to her followers or the seal attributed to the documents submitted by the plaintiff. To invite them, and did not provide what is useful for payment, so these documents are an argument in confronting them with what they included and sacrificed – and the case as well – the defendant is occupied in favor of the plaintiff at the amount of 11374 dinars, and the claim of the plaintiff has coincided with the right of the law to answer her request.
The court ruled that the defendant compel the defendant to pay the plaintiff to the amount of 11374 dinars with the delay interest by 4% annually from the date of filing the lawsuit on 10/28/2024, until complete payment, and obliged her to lead to the plaintiff the case fees and for law fees.
