๐ Saudi journalist Mohammed Al-Sheikh criticized the Croatian referee Ivan Bajak, due to his controversial decisions during the Al-Ittihad and Riyadh match, which ended with the dean’s victory with a result (2-1) in the Saudi Roshen Professional League competitions.
โฝ A controversial penalty kick that resolves confrontation
๐น The match witnessed a widespread arbitration controversy, especially after the referee won a penalty in favor of Al -Ittihad in the last minute, after returning to video technology (VAR), so that Saleh Al -Shehri succeeded in scoring the deadly victory goal.
๐น Muhammad Al -Sheikh, during his appearance on the โAction with Walidโ program, indicated that some believe that Saleh Al -Shehri was the one who gave the union victory, but he sees that the Croatian referee is the main reason behind the victory of the dean, by holding an incorrect penalty according to the opinions of most arbitration experts.
๐๏ธ The statements of Muhammad Al -Sheikh
๐ฌ โThe referee was the one who gave the union the three points, not the monthly. If the penalty kick was not counted, the match would have ended in a draw.โ
๐ฌ “There are many controversial decisions, but the most influential decision was to calculate the decisive penalty kick, which did not exist.”
๐ฅ Arbitration controversy in the Saudi League
ุงูู ุฑุงูุฉ The controversy over the arbitration decisions in the Saudi League is not new, as the last seasons have witnessed many cases that have angered fans and analysts, which opens the door for demands to develop the level of arbitration to ensure the fairness of the competition.
