Tuesday 25/Feb/2025 – 10:29 PM
Cairo continues 24 publishing the reasons for the innocence of the journalist Ibrahim Fayek, the presenter of the ball program with Fayek and the editor -in -chief of the journalist program, Ahmed Abdel Baset, from the charges of urging the hatred of the victim, Mohamed Adel, and publishing information and news related to him without his consent.
The reasons for the innocence of Ibrahim Fayek and Ahmed Abdel Baset
And it came in the rationale after reading the papers and hearing the pleading and deliberately, as the lawsuits of the lawsuit get that the investigative authorities submitted the accused Ibrahim Fayek and Ahmed Abdel Baset, because during the month of November 2024 in the Department of the First Department of Sheikh Zayed Giza Governorate:
Regarding the second accusation, which is public, on the occasion of a sports activity in urging the hatred of the victim, the referee Muhammad Adel, and the referee Mido Salama; That I assign them on television, as well as the social networking site Facebook, the phrases shown in papers that would raise doubts about their integrity during their work duties, as it is clear in detail.
As well as the fourth accusation attributed to the accused, which is to publish information and news about the victims, Mohamed Adel, and Mido Salama through the social networking site Facebook, and that was without their satisfaction, as shown in detail in the investigations
It stated in the rationale: that, according to the text of Article 25 of Law No. 175 of 2018 regarding information technology, as it shall be punished with imprisonment for a period of no less than six months, and a fine of no less than fifty thousand pounds and not exceeding one hundred thousand pounds, or one of these two penalties, everyone who assaulted me Any of the principles or family values in Egyptian society or violated the sanctity Personality to a system or website for promoting goods or services without its consent, or published through the information network or one of the means of information technology information, news, pictures, and the like, violates the privacy of any person without his consent, whether the published information is correct or incorrect.
Al -Hu’itiyat continued: that it is not permissible for him to build his ruling on any evidence that he did not present before him in the session, and every saying that it was issued from one of the accused or witnesses under the weight of coercion or the threat of it wasted and does not count on it.
Since the court, by following the other case papers, on the sight and insight, is certain that the pillars of the second accusation assigned to the accused are the verse and its proof that with regard to criminal crime 84 of Law No. 71 of 2017 regarding the Sports Law, as the presentation of the clip and comment on it was on the occasion of analyzing the occasion mathematical and it was from The usual circulation of such news and information about arbitration errors and sports events to enrich the viewer with information And enable it to stand on the level of arbitration performance and whether it needs to be developed.
And she added: Or the use of foreign elements to contribute to that development, and all this does not include any presence of the hatred of any of the participants in the activity or mathematical occasion – even if it includes material actions that make up other crimes – but rather that the defendants did not obtain from the victim with any words or expressions that obtain from Their person, but their comment on a currency, such as the referee of a square and a video, and those who were already satisfied with their work in a system The arbitration is from dealing with criticism and analyzing their decisions, whether it is correct or wrong, which the court requires the acquittal of the accused, which was attributed to them on the third accusation, as it will respond to the operative.
Since the court, by following the other case papers, on the sight and insight, is certain that the pillars of the fourth accusation assigned to the accused are the verse and his proof that with regard to criminal crime under the text of Article 25 of Law No. 175 of 2018, regarding the crimes of information technology, the court does not see the availability of a violation of privacy and publication News and information about the victim without his consent.
Whereas, the registration took place within an official work environment related to sports arbitration, which is not prepared personally or is included within the scope of private life legally protected in accordance with the text of Article 25 of Law 175 of 2018, which requires that registration be related to private life and its prohibition and not to public work, Whereas, the Egyptian constitution has guaranteed in Article 68 the right to circulate information and freedom of the press and the media, as Article 71 stressed that it is not permissible to impose a negative penalty for freedom In crimes related to publishing, except for what affects national security or incites violence.
Whereas, the publication of the clip, information and news related to the victim was with the aim of highlighting an arbitration decision that may affect the justice of the competition, which is of general importance, which justifies its publication based on the principles of transparency and the public interest organized by the constitution and since their publication came in the context of critical media coverage For a controversial arbitration decision, although it is transgressing the right to broadcast and publish the right of the right, which is within the scope Their media and journalistic work, in addition, the registration and description materials do not apply to the fourth accusation, given the lack of legal protection for conversations, news and information that takes place within the scope of public work, as the dialogue between the two rulings was part of their job tasks, and not a private or personal hadith that enjoys With the legal protection prescribed for the private life of individuals in accordance with the text of Article 25, the statement is preceded, even if it represents its violation of the text Another text of the Sports Law as he will respond.
Which the court requires the acquittal of the defendants, which was attributed to them on the fourth accusation, as it will respond to the operator.
