Baldry, I. K. et al. Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 373, 469–483 (2006).
Google Scholar
Gadotti, D. A. Structural properties of pseudo-bulges, classical bulges and elliptical galaxies: a Sloan Digital Sky Survey perspective. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393, 1531–1552 (2009).
Google Scholar
Brooks, A. & Christensen, C. in Galactic Bulges (eds Laurikainen, E., Peletier, R. & Gadotti, D.) 317–353 (Springer, 2016).
Oser, L., Naab, T., Ostriker, J. P. & Johansson, P. H. The cosmological size and velocity dispersion evolution of massive early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 744, 63 (2012).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y.-j et al. Mass and environment as drivers of galaxy evolution in SDSS and zCOSMOS and the origin of the Schechter function. Astrophys. J. 721, 193–221 (2010).
Google Scholar
Blain, A. W., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Kneib, J. P. & Frayer, D. T. Submillimeter galaxies. Phys. Rep. 369, 111–176 (2002).
Google Scholar
Lilly, S. et al. Deep sub-mm surveys: high redshift ULIRGs and the formation of the metal-rich spheroids. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9903157 (1999).
Archibald, E. N. et al. Coupled spheroid and black hole formation, and the multifrequency detectability of active galactic nuclei and submillimetre sources. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336, 353–362 (2002).
Google Scholar
Dunne, L., Eales, S. A. & Edmunds, M. G. A census of metals at high and low redshift and the connection between submillimetre sources and spheroid formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 341, 589–598 (2003).
Google Scholar
De Lucia, G., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Croton, D. & Kauffmann, G. The formation history of elliptical galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 366, 499–509 (2006).
Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. J. et al. Submillimeter galaxies at z ~ 2: evidence for major mergers and constraints on lifetimes, IMF, and CO-H2 conversion factor. Astrophys. J. 680, 246–262 (2008).
Google Scholar
Brisbin, D. et al. An ALMA survey of submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field: multiwavelength counterparts and redshift distribution. Astron. Astrophys. 608, A15 (2017).
Le Bail, A. et al. JWST/CEERS sheds light on dusty star-forming galaxies: forming bulges, lopsidedness, and outside-in quenching at cosmic noon. Astron. Astrophys. 688, A53 (2024).
Cardona-Torres, L., Aretxaga, I., Montaña, A., Zavala, J. A. & Faber, S. M. The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: the EGS deep field – III. The evolution of faint submillimetre galaxies at z < 4. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 5446–5463 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gillman, S. et al. Sub-millimetre galaxies with Webb. Near-infrared counterparts and multi-wavelength morphology. Astron. Astrophys. 676, A26 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gullberg, B. et al. An ALMA survey of the SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey UKIDSS/UDS field: high-resolution dust continuum morphologies and the link between sub-millimetre galaxies and spheroid formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 4956–4974 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hodge, J. A. et al. ALMA reveals potential evidence for spiral arms, bars, and rings in high-redshift submillimeter galaxies. Astrophys. J. 876, 130 (2019).
Google Scholar
Adscheid, S. et al. A3COSMOS and A3GOODSS: continuum source catalogues and multi-band number counts. Astron. Astrophys 685, A1 (2024).
van der Wel, A. et al. 3D-HST+CANDELS: the evolution of the galaxy size–mass distribution since z = 3. Astrophys. J. 788, 28 (2014).
Google Scholar
Magnelli, B. et al. CEERS: MIRI deciphers the spatial distribution of dust-obscured star formation in galaxies at 0.1 < z < 2.5. Astron. Astrophys. 678, A83 (2023).
Google Scholar
Spergel, D. N. Analytical galaxy profiles for photometric and lensing analysis. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 191, 58–65 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tan, Q.-H. et al. Fitting pseudo-Sérsic (Spergel) light profiles to galaxies in interferometric data: the excellence of the uυ-plane. Astron. Astrophys. 684, A23 (2024).
Sérsic, J. L. Atlas de Galaxias Australes (Observatorio Astronomico, 1968).
Dutton, A. A. On the origin of exponential galaxy discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 396, 121–140 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wang, E. & Lilly, S. J. The origin of exponential star-forming disks. Astrophys. J. 927, 217 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. 3D intrinsic shapes of quiescent galaxies in observations and simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 4814–4832 (2022).
Google Scholar
Patra, N. N. Molecular scale height in spiral galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 81–92 (2019).
Google Scholar
Padilla, N. D. & Strauss, M. A. The shapes of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388, 1321–1334 (2008).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S. & Padilla, N. D. The intrinsic shape of galaxies in SDSS/Galaxy Zoo. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 2153–2166 (2013).
Google Scholar
van der Wel, A. et al. Geometry of star-forming galaxies from SDSS, 3D-HST, and CANDELS. Astrophys. J. Lett. 792, L6 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lovell, C. C. et al. An orientation bias in observations of submillimetre galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 3644–3655 (2022).
Google Scholar
Traina, A. et al. A3COSMOS: the infrared luminosity function and dust-obscured star formation rate density at 0.5 < z < 6. Astron. Astrophys. 681, A118 (2024).
Weaver, J. R. et al. COSMOS2020: the galaxy stellar mass function. The assembly and star formation cessation of galaxies at 0.2 < z ≤ 7.5. Astron. Astrophys. 677, A184 (2023).
Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., Bournaud, F. & Elmegreen, D. M. Bulge formation by the coalescence of giant clumps in primordial disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 688, 67 (2008).
Google Scholar
Dekel, A., Sari, R. & Ceverino, D. Formation of massive galaxies at high redshift: cold streams, clumpy disks, and compact spheroids. Astrophys. J. 703, 785–801 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ceverino, D., Dekel, A., Tweed, D. & Primack, J. Early formation of massive, compact, spheroidal galaxies with classical profiles by violent disc instability or mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 3291–3310 (2015).
Google Scholar
Toomre, A. in Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations (eds Tinsley, B. M. & Larson, R. B.) 401 (Yale University Observatory, 1977).
Scannapieco, C., White, S. D. M., Springel, V. & Tissera, P. B. The formation and survival of discs in a ΛCDM universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 396, 696–708 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sales, L. V. et al. The origin of discs and spheroids in simulated galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 423, 1544–1555 (2012).
Google Scholar
Aumer, M. & White, S. D. M. Idealized models for galactic disc formation and evolution in ‘realistic’ ΛCDM haloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 1055–1076 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dubois, Y. et al. Dancing in the dark: galactic properties trace spin swings along the cosmic web. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 1453–1468 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bournaud, F. et al. Hydrodynamics of high-redshift galaxy collisions: from gas-rich disks to dispersion-dominated mergers and compact spheroids. Astrophys. J. 730, 4 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kalita, B. S. et al. Bulge formation inside quiescent lopsided stellar disks: connecting accretion, star formation, and morphological transformation in a z ~ 3 galaxy group. Astron. Astrophys. 666, A44 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kraljic, K. et al. Galaxies flowing in the oriented saddle frame of the cosmic web. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 3227–3254 (2019).
Google Scholar
Puglisi, A. et al. The main sequence at z ~ 1.3 contains a sizable fraction of galaxies with compact star formation sizes: a new population of early post-starbursts?. Astrophys. J. Lett. 877, L23 (2019).
Google Scholar
Silverman, J. D. et al. The molecular gas content and fuel efficiency of starbursts at z ~ 1.6 with ALMA. Astrophys. J. 867, 92 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schaye, J. et al. The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 521–554 (2015).
Google Scholar
McAlpine, S. et al. The nature of submillimetre and highly star-forming galaxies in the EAGLE simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 2440–2454 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cibinel, A. et al. Early- and late-stage mergers among main sequence and starburst galaxies at 0.2 ≤ z ≤ 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 5631–5651 (2019).
Google Scholar
Setton, D. J. et al. UNCOVER NIRSpec/PRISM spectroscopy unveils evidence of early core formation in a massive, centrally dusty quiescent galaxy at zspec = 3.97. Astrophys. J. 974, 145 (2024).
Liu, D. et al. Automated mining of the ALMA archive in the COSMOS field (A3COSMOS). I. Robust ALMA continuum photometry catalogs and stellar mass and star formation properties for ~700 galaxies at z = 0.5–6. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 244, 40 (2019).
Google Scholar
Elbaz, D. et al. Starbursts in and out of the star-formation main sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A110 (2018).
Silverman, J. D. et al. Concurrent starbursts in molecular gas disks within a pair of colliding galaxies at z = 1.52. Astrophys. J. 868, 75 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rujopakarn, W. et al. ALMA 200 pc resolution imaging of smooth cold dusty disks in typical z ~ 3 star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 882, 107 (2019).
Google Scholar
Valentino, F. et al. CO emission in distant galaxies on and above the main sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A155 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jin, S. et al. Diagnosing deceivingly cold dusty galaxies at 3.5 < z < 6: a substantial population of compact starbursts with high infrared optical depths. Astron. Astrophys. 665, A3 (2022).
Google Scholar
Weaver, J. R. et al. COSMOS2020: a panchromatic view of the Universe to z ~ 10 from two complementary catalogs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 258, 11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jin, S. et al. “Super-deblended” dust emission in galaxies. II. Far-IR to (sub)millimeter photometry and high-redshift galaxy candidates in the full COSMOS field. Astrophys. J. 864, 56 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chabrier, G. The galactic disk mass function: reconciliation of the Hubble Space Telescope and nearby determinations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 586, L133–L136 (2003).
Google Scholar
Daddi, E. et al. Multiwavelength study of massive galaxies at z~2. I. Star formation and galaxy growth. Astrophys. J. 670, 156–172 (2007).
Google Scholar
Elbaz, D. et al. The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe. Astron. Astrophys. 468, 33–48 (2007).
Google Scholar
Noeske, K. G. et al. Star formation in AEGIS field galaxies since z =1.1: the dominance of gradually declining star formation, and the main sequence of star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. Lett. 660, L43–L46 (2007).
Google Scholar
Rodighiero, G. et al. The lesser role of starbursts in star formation at z = 2. Astrophys. J. Lett. 739, L40 (2011).
Google Scholar
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI (eds Shaw, R. A., Hill, F. & Bell, D. J.) 127 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2007).
Guilloteau, S. & Lucas, R. in Imaging at Radio through Submillimeter Wavelengths (eds Mangum, J. G. & Radford, S. J. E.) 299 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2000).
Martí-Vidal, I., Pérez-Torres, M. A. & Lobanov, A. P. Over-resolution of compact sources in interferometric observations. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A135 (2012).
Google Scholar
Franco, M. et al. GOODS-ALMA: 1.1 mm galaxy survey. I. Source catalog and optically dark galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A152 (2018).
Google Scholar
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
Google Scholar
Binney, J. Testing for triaxiality with kinematic data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 212, 767–781 (1985).
Google Scholar
Ryden, B. S. The ellipticity of the disks of spiral galaxies. Astrophys. J. 601, 214–220 (2004).
Google Scholar
Narayanan, D. & Krumholz, M. R. A theory for the excitation of CO in star-forming galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, 1411–1428 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rujopakarn, W., Rieke, G. H., Eisenstein, D. J. & Juneau, S. Morphology and size differences between local and high-redshift luminous infrared galaxies. Astrophys. J. 726, 93 (2011).
Google Scholar
Barcos-Muñoz, L. et al. A 33 GHz survey of local major mergers: estimating the sizes of the energetically dominant regions from high-resolution measurements of the radio continuum. Astrophys. J. 843, 117 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ueda, J. et al. Cold molecular gas in merger remnants. I. Formation of molecular gas disks. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 214, 1 (2014).
Google Scholar
Barro, G. et al. Structural and star-forming relations since z ~ 3: connecting compact star-forming and quiescent galaxies. Astrophys. J. 840, 47 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xiao, M. Y. et al. Starbursts with suppressed velocity dispersion revealed in a forming cluster at z = 2.51. Astron. Astrophys. 664, A63 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lelli, F. et al. Cold gas disks in main-sequence galaxies at cosmic noon: low turbulence, flat rotation curves, and disk-halo degeneracy. Astron. Astrophys. 672, A106 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rizzo, F. et al. The ALMA-ALPAKA survey. I. High-resolution CO and [CI] kinematics of star-forming galaxies at z = 0.5–3.5. Astron. Astrophys. 679, A129 (2023).
Amvrosiadis, A. et al. The kinematics of massive high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08959 (2023).
Liu, D. et al. An ~600 pc view of the strongly lensed, massive main-sequence galaxy J0901: a baryon-dominated, thick turbulent rotating disk with a clumpy cold gas ring at z = 2.259. Astrophys. J. 942, 98 (2023).
Google Scholar
Birkin, J. E. et al. KAOSS: turbulent, but disc-like kinematics in dust-obscured star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1.3–2.6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 61–83 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cappellari, M. Structure and kinematics of early-type galaxies from integral field spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 597–665 (2016).
Google Scholar
McAlpine, S. et al. The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: public release of halo and galaxy catalogues. Astron. Comput. 15, 72–89 (2016).
Google Scholar
Camps, P. et al. Data release of UV to submillimeter broadband fluxes for simulated galaxies from the EAGLE project. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 234, 20 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schreiber, C. et al. The Herschel view of the dominant mode of galaxy growth from z = 4 to the present day. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A74 (2015).
