Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. M. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 613–626 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kelly, T. K. et al. Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation within individual DNA molecules. Genome Res. 22, 2497–2506 (2012).
Google Scholar
Krebs, A. R. et al. Genome-wide single-molecule footprinting reveals high RNA polymerase II turnover at paused promoters. Mol. Cell 67, 411–422 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vierstra, J. et al. Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints. Nature 583, 729–736 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Z. & Mirny, L. A. Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. Trends Genet. 25, 434–440 (2009).
Google Scholar
Giniger, E. & Ptashne, M. Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 382–386 (1988).
Google Scholar
Pettersson, M. & Schaffner, W. Synergistic activation of transcription by multiple binding sites for NF-kappa B even in absence of co-operative factor binding to DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 214, 373–380 (1990).
Google Scholar
Thanos, D. & Maniatis, T. Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83, 1091–1100 (1995).
Google Scholar
Mirny, L. A. Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22534–22539 (2010).
Google Scholar
Biddie, S. C. et al. Transcription factor AP1 potentiates chromatin accessibility and glucocorticoid receptor binding. Mol. Cell 43, 145–155 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fryer, C. J. & Archer, T. K. Chromatin remodelling by the glucocorticoid receptor requires the BRG1 complex. Nature 393, 88–91 (1998).
Google Scholar
Herschlag, D. & Johnson, F. B. Synergism in transcriptional activation: a kinetic view. Genes Dev. 7, 173–179 (1993).
Google Scholar
Martinez-Corral, R. et al. Transcriptional kinetic synergy: a complex landscape revealed by integrating modeling and synthetic biology. Cell Syst. 14, 324–339 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shipony, Z. et al. Long-range single-molecule mapping of chromatin accessibility in eukaryotes. Nat. Methods 17, 319–327 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stergachis, A. B., Debo, B. M., Haugen, E., Churchman, L. S. & Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A. Single-molecule regulatory architectures captured by chromatin fiber sequencing. Science 368, 1449–1454 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sönmezer, C. et al. Molecular co-occupancy identifies transcription factor binding cooperativity in vivo. Mol. Cell 81, 255–267 (2021).
Google Scholar
Levo, M. et al. Systematic investigation of transcription factor activity in the context of chromatin using massively parallel binding and expression assays. Mol. Cell 65, 604–617 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bintu, L. et al. Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 116–124 (2005).
Google Scholar
Gossen, M. et al. Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. Science 268, 1766–1769 (1995).
Google Scholar
Vaisvila, R. et al. Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA. Genome Res. 31, 1280–1289 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ackers, G. K., Johnson, A. D. & Shea, M. A. Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1129–1133 (1982).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. D. & O’Shea, E. K. A quantitative model of transcription factor-activated gene expression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1192–1198 (2008).
Google Scholar
Neely, K. E. et al. Activation domain-mediated targeting of the SWI/SNF complex to promoters stimulates transcription from nucleosome arrays. Mol. Cell 4, 649–655 (1999).
Google Scholar
Yudkovsky, N., Logie, C., Hahn, S. & Peterson, C. L. Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by transcriptional activators. Genes Dev. 13, 2369–2374 (1999).
Google Scholar
Neely, K. E., Hassan, A. H., Brown, C. E., Howe, L. & Workman, J. L. Transcription activator interactions with multiple SWI/SNF subunits. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 1615–1625 (2002).
Google Scholar
Papillon, J. P. N. et al. Discovery of orally active inhibitors of Brahma homolog (BRM)/SMARCA2 ATPase activity for the treatment of Brahma related gene 1 (BRG1)/SMARCA4-mutant cancers. J. Med. Chem. 61, 10155–10172 (2018).
Google Scholar
Martin, B. J. E. et al. Global identification of SWI/SNF targets reveals compensation by EP400. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.10.006 (2023).
Kundu, T. K. et al. Activator-dependent transcription from chromatin in vitro involving targeted histone acetylation by p300. Mol. Cell 6, 551–561 (2000).
Google Scholar
Alerasool, N., Leng, H., Lin, Z.-Y., Gingras, A.-C. & Taipale, M. Identification and functional characterization of transcriptional activators in human cells. Mol. Cell 82, 677–695 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).
Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, B. et al. Specific contributions of histone tails and their acetylation to the mechanical stability of nucleosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 346, 135–146 (2005).
Google Scholar
Lasko, L. M. et al. Discovery of a selective catalytic p300/CBP inhibitor that targets lineage-specific tumours. Nature 550, 128–132 (2017).
Google Scholar
Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y. & Tyagi, S. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e309 (2006).
Google Scholar
Suter, D. M. et al. Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics. Science 332, 472–474 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chong, S., Chen, C., Ge, H. & Xie, X. S. Mechanism of transcriptional bursting in bacteria. Cell 158, 314–326 (2014).
Google Scholar
Xiao, J. Y., Hafner, A. & Boettiger, A. N. How subtle changes in 3D structure can create large changes in transcription. Elife 10, e64320 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zuin, J. et al. Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer–promoter interactions. Nature 604, 571–577 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gossen, M. & Bujard, H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5547–5551 (1992).
Google Scholar
Kessler, D. S., Veals, S. A., Fu, X. Y. & Levy, D. E. Interferon-alpha regulates nuclear translocation and DNA-binding affinity of ISGF3, a multimeric transcriptional activator. Genes Dev. 4, 1753–1765 (1990).
Google Scholar
Lazear, H. M., Schoggins, J. W. & Diamond, M. S. Shared and distinct functions of type I and type III interferons. Immunity 50, 907–923 (2019).
Google Scholar
Platanitis, E. et al. A molecular switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 underlies interferon-induced gene transcription. Nat. Commun. 10, 2921 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rengachari, S. et al. Structural basis of STAT2 recognition by IRF9 reveals molecular insights into ISGF3 function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E601–E609 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bluyssen, H. A. & Levy, D. E. Stat2 is a transcriptional activator that requires sequence-specific contacts provided by stat1 and p48 for stable interaction with DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4600–4605 (1997).
Google Scholar
Patel, M. C. et al. BRD4 coordinates recruitment of pause release factor P-TEFb and the pausing complex NELF/DSIF to regulate transcription elongation of interferon-stimulated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 2497–2507 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cui, K. et al. The chromatin-remodeling BAF complex mediates cellular antiviral activities by promoter priming. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 4476–4486 (2004).
Google Scholar
Manry, J. et al. Evolutionary genetic dissection of human interferons. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2747–2759 (2011).
Google Scholar
Krause, C. D. & Pestka, S. Cut, copy, move, delete: the study of human interferon genes reveal multiple mechanisms underlying their evolution in amniotes. Cytokine 76, 480–495 (2015).
Google Scholar
Arimoto, K.-I., Miyauchi, S., Stoner, S. A., Fan, J.-B. & Zhang, D.-E. Negative regulation of type I IFN signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.2MIR0817-342R (2018).
Mostafavi, S. et al. Parsing the interferon transcriptional network and its disease associations. Cell 164, 564–578 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dogan, N. et al. Occupancy by key transcription factors is a more accurate predictor of enhancer activity than histone modifications or chromatin accessibility. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 16 (2015).
Google Scholar
Corces, M. R. et al. Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution. Nat. Genet. 48, 1193–1203 (2016).
Google Scholar
Weirauch, M. T. et al. Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 126–134 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lee, D. Y., Hayes, J. J., Pruss, D. & Wolffe, A. P. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell 72, 73–84 (1993).
Google Scholar
Struhl, K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev. 12, 599–606 (1998).
Google Scholar
Narita, T. et al. Enhancers are activated by p300/CBP activity-dependent PIC assembly, RNAPII recruitment, and pause release. Mol. Cell 81, 2166–2182 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ferrie, J. J. et al. p300 is an obligate integrator of combinatorial transcription factor inputs. Mol. Cell 84, 234–243.e4 (2024).
Kornberg, R. D. & Lorch, Y. Irresistible force meets immovable object: transcription and the nucleosome. Cell 67, 833–836 (1991).
Google Scholar
Boeger, H. Kinetic proofreading. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 91, 423–447 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wong, F. & Gunawardena, J. Gene regulation in and out of equilibrium. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 49, 199–226 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shelansky, R. & Boeger, H. Nucleosomal proofreading of activator-promoter interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2456–2461 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, S., Salmon, G. L., Daghlian, P., Garcia, H. G. & Phillips, R. Flexibility and sensitivity in gene regulation out of equilibrium. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.11.536490 (2023).
Guharajan, S., Parisutham, V. & Brewster, R. C. Probing the dependence of transcription factor regulatory modes on promoter features. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.596689 (2024).
Vaisvila, R. et al. Discovery of cytosine deaminases enables base-resolution methylome mapping using a single enzyme. Mol. Cell 84, 854–866 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, R. et al. Human transcription factor combinations mapped by footprinting with deaminase. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.14.599019 (2024).
Policarpi, C., Munafò, M., Tsagkris, S., Carlini, V. & Hackett, J. A. Systematic epigenome editing captures the context-dependent instructive function of chromatin modifications. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01706-w (2024).
DelRosso, N. et al. Large-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains. Nature 616, 365–372 (2023).
Google Scholar
Durrant, M. G. et al. Systematic discovery of recombinases for efficient integration of large DNA sequences into the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 488–499 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tycko, J. et al. High-throughput discovery and characterization of human transcriptional effectors. Cell 183, 2020–2035 (2020).
Google Scholar
Iurlaro, M. et al. Mammalian SWI/SNF continuously restores local accessibility to chromatin. Nat. Genet. 53, 279–287 (2021).
Google Scholar
Weinert, B. T. et al. Time-resolved analysis reveals rapid dynamics and broad scope of the CBP/p300 acetylome. Cell 174, 231–244 (2018).
Google Scholar
Teague, B. Cytoflow: a Python toolbox for flow cytometry. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.22.501078 (2022).
Pedersen, B. S., Eyring, K., De, S., Yang, I. V. & Schwartz, D. A. Fast and accurate alignment of long bisulfite-seq reads. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1129 (2014).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 959–962 (2017).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Google Scholar
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat. Methods 14, 975–978 (2017).
Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Google Scholar
Marinov, G. K. ChIP-seq for the identification of functional elements in the human genome. Methods Mol. Biol. 1543, 3–18 (2017).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Google Scholar
Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1728–1740 (2012).
Google Scholar
Marinov, G. K. Identification of candidate functional elements in the genome from ChIP-seq data. Methods Mol. Biol. 1543, 19–43 (2017).
Google Scholar
Doughty, B. GreenleafLab/synthetic_enhancer_footprinting_additional_materials: SMF Paper Files. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13841007 (2024).
Doughty, B. GreenleafLab/amplicon-smf: amplicon-smf v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13840888 (2024).
